LSAC, Misconduct and Irregularities in the Admission Process
LSAC Letter of Charge: Misconduct and Irregularities
This is the most formal process on this page and the one with the longest reach. LSAC gives you the evidence against you, 30 days to answer, and a choice between a decision on the papers and a hearing. A finding goes to every law school you have applied to or will apply to, and to bar admission authorities.
Intent is not an element, and the record closes early
LSAC's rules state that intent is not an element of a finding of misconduct or irregularity. An honest mistake on an application can support a finding, and the findings do not even specify which of the two occurred. The rules also provide that a case will not be reopened on exculpatory evidence you could have obtained with reasonable diligence earlier. Everything you have must go in at the first response.
The deadlines, before anything else
Every process on this page can be lost on a date rather than on the evidence. Put these in a calendar before you start drafting anything.
Written response to the letter of charge
30 days from mailing
From the date of mailing, not receipt. No written response forfeits both the hearing and the appeal.
Request for a telephonic hearing
In the same 30 days, in writing
The request must be in writing and must address the specific allegations to secure the hearing.
Hearing held
Within 60 days of the request
Notice of appeal
15 calendar days
From the date of the Representative's determination. Reporting to law schools happens once this window expires.
Testing rules are revised regularly, and the version in force on your test date is the one that governs your case. The notice you received controls. Read it against the rules as they stood when you tested.
What triggers a review on the LSAT
- •Submitting information that is false, inconsistent, or misleading anywhere in the admission process
- •Omitting information in a way that may produce a false or misleading conclusion
- •Violating LSAT test-taking regulations
- •An altered or non-authentic transcript
- •Falsified employment, honors, or credentials
- •Impersonation on the LSAT, or advance access to test materials
How the process actually runs
Taken from Law School Admission Council’s own published rules. Stages shown in grey are past the point where we assist, and are included so you can see the whole route rather than only our part of it.
Investigation, and a withheld report
A concern can come from a law school, a test proctor, or LSAC staff. The investigation continues whether or not the party who raised it wants to withdraw. Where the alleged misconduct calls your LSAC data into question, transmission of that data is withheld pending disposition and schools that already received reports are told there may be an error, with a final report to follow. You are notified in writing of the reasons for the delay.
The letter of charge gives you the evidence
If staff forward a charge, the Chair of the Subcommittee sends you a letter of charge detailing the allegations, a copy of all the evidence, and a copy of the rules. This is more disclosure than most processes on this page provide, and it is the material your response has to answer.
Thirty days to respond in writing, and a choice
You have 30 days from the date of mailing, not from the date you read it, to respond in writing. In that response you either address the specific allegations and ask for a determination on a Subcommittee Representative's review of the record, or address the specific allegations and request a hearing. If you do not respond in writing, the Chair decides the case as the Representative and you forfeit the right to a hearing and to an appeal.
The hearing, if you ask for it in writing
A telephonic hearing is conducted by the Subcommittee Representative within 60 days of the written request. In advance you receive the documentation and witness statements that may be relied on, the identity of all adverse witnesses, and notice of physical evidence, and you may examine the original evidence beforehand. The hearing is recorded and transcribed, formal rules of evidence do not apply, and hearsay may be admitted. You may make a statement, present evidence and witnesses, and be represented by counsel.
Determination on a preponderance of the evidence
The Representative decides whether a preponderance of the evidence shows that misconduct or an irregularity exists. The findings state that one exists without specifying which, and no inquiry into intent is made. Staff report the finding to the law schools you applied to or subsequently apply to, and to other affected parties, after the 15-day appeal period expires.
Appeal within 15 calendar days
Either you or the initiating party may appeal. Written notice must reach LSAC within 15 calendar days of the determination and must state the reasons and the relief requested. A three-member Appeal Panel, none of whom took part in the initial determination, decides on the record including the hearing transcript, and both sides may submit additional written information. A majority affirming means dissemination to the schools; a reversal sets the determination aside. The Appeal Panel's decision is final.
What we do, and where we stop
There is no arbitration in this process, so the whole of it is institutional. That does not mean an advisor is always the right help. A finding here is reported to bar admission and grievance authorities in jurisdictions where you are admitted or seeking admission, and the rules contemplate that both you and LSAC may be represented by counsel at a hearing. We are education advisors, not attorneys, and we do not appear as counsel. Where bar admission or an existing law license is in play, we will say that a lawyer is the right call, and we will help you get the response in order either way.
AdvocatED is an education advising practice, not a law firm. We do not provide legal representation or legal advice. When you need an attorney instead.
How AdvocatED Helps With a LSAT Score Review
You are being asked to answer a charge, under a standard where intent does not help you, in a process whose findings follow you to the bar.
Where guidance pays off most:Intent is not an element of a finding. An answer built around not having meant it is answering a question nobody is asking.
- Work through the evidence LSAC sent, which is the whole file it intends to rely on
- Calendar the 30 days from the mailing date and the 15-day appeal window from day one
- Decide between a decision on the papers and a hearing, which is a real strategic fork and is waived by silence
- Assemble every piece of exculpatory evidence now, because the rules bar reopening on evidence you could have found with reasonable diligence
- Draft a response that answers each specific allegation rather than arguing that you meant no harm
- Prepare you for a telephonic hearing: what the Representative examines, how statements are used, what the transcript captures
- Say plainly when the licensure exposure means you should have a lawyer, not an advisor
Mistakes that cost people the case
- ×Letting the 30 days run from when you opened the envelope. The rules run from the date of mailing.
- ×Not responding at all. The Chair then decides the case and you forfeit the hearing and the appeal together.
- ×Responding without addressing the specific allegations. That is what the rules require to secure a hearing.
- ×Holding evidence back for the appeal. The rules bar reopening on evidence reasonable diligence would have found earlier.
- ×Treating it as an admissions problem. Reports reach bar admission and grievance authorities and are retained indefinitely.
Questions we get about LSAT score reviews
How long do I have to respond to an LSAC letter of charge?
Thirty days from the date of mailing of the letter of charge, under LSAC's published rules. The clock runs from mailing, not from when you received or read it, so the date on the letter is what matters. If you do not respond in writing within that window, the Chair of the Subcommittee decides the case acting as the Subcommittee Representative and you forfeit the right to a hearing and to an appeal.
Is it a defense that I did not mean to do it?
No. LSAC's rules state that intent is not an element of a finding of misconduct or irregularity, and the determination makes no inquiry into intent. An inconsistency that arose from carelessness can support a finding on the same terms as a deliberate one. The findings also state only that misconduct or an irregularity exists, without specifying which, leaving the characterization to the law schools that receive the report.
Should I request a hearing or a decision on the written record?
It depends on whether your account needs to be heard or your documents speak for themselves. A hearing gives you advance disclosure of the documentation, witness statements, and the identity of adverse witnesses, a chance to examine the original evidence, and the opportunity to make a statement and call witnesses, all on a transcript. A decision on the papers is faster and avoids live questioning. The request must be made in writing within the 30 days and must address the specific allegations, so the choice has to be made before the window closes.
Who finds out about an LSAC misconduct finding?
Under the rules, a report goes to you, to law schools you have applied to or subsequently apply to, to bar admission and grievance authorities in jurisdictions where you are admitted or seek admission, to other persons or institutions deemed to have an appropriate interest, and to LSAC staff. A notation appears on LSAT and Credential Assembly Service reports, and LSAC states that such records are retained indefinitely. The report does not include recommendations for what any recipient should do.
Should I hire a lawyer instead of an advisor for an LSAC charge?
Often, yes, and we will tell you so. The rules contemplate that you and LSAC may each be represented by counsel at a hearing, and a finding is reported to bar admission and grievance authorities, which makes this a professional licensure matter and not only an admissions one. We are education advisors and do not appear as counsel. We can help you work through the evidence file, meet the deadlines, and build the written response, and where the licensure exposure is real we say that a lawyer should be driving.
Where this comes from
Every stage, deadline and standard on this page was read against Law School Admission Council’s own published rules in October 2026. We link them so you can check us, and so you can compare them against the version in force on your test date.
- LSAC Rules Governing Misconduct and Irregularities in the Admission Process
Revised August 2021. Sections 3, 6, 9 through 13, and 15.
- LSAC, Misconduct and Irregularities
The overview, and the address for inquiries.
Other exams we handle
Got a letter about your LSAT score?
Send us the notice. The case review is free, and the first thing we will tell you is which deadline you are working against.