Tennessee · Public University
Facing a Student Conduct & Community Standards (SCCS); UAPA hearing (for deferred suspension or greater) proceeding? AdvocatED advisors know Tennessee's specific process under UT Rules of Conduct (Chapter 1720-04-03); Hilltopics Student Handbook (Chapter 1720-04-03).
If you just received notice
Governing Policy
Preponderance of the evidence
All undergraduate conduct and academic dishonesty violations at UT Knoxville under Chapter 1720-04-03 Rules of Conduct.
Who Decides Your Case
UT Knoxville administers conduct through SCCS. For cases with recommended sanctions of deferred suspension or greater, a Uniform Administrative Procedures Act (UAPA) hearing is available, conducted by an administrative law judge with attorneys permitted to advocate for both parties. Academic dishonesty appeals go to the head of the department in which the course is located.
If a professor believes a student engaged in academic misconduct, the professor provides the student an informal opportunity to respond. The instructor gathers information, documents the incident, analyzes it, and decides whether to move forward. Students receive documents and are expected to carefully review them and sign the Resolution Option Form within 5 business days.
The Resolution Option Form requires the student to choose how to resolve the case. A UAPA hearing, with an administrative law judge and attorneys permitted, is available ONLY for students receiving a recommended sanction of deferred suspension or greater. Alternative resolutions (mediation, facilitated dialogue, conflict coaching, restorative justice) are available by mutual agreement.
A student may appeal the imposition of an academic penalty by submitting an appeal in writing to the head of the department in which the course is located within 5 business days. The appeal must specify reasons, but the ONLY ground is that the penalty is unreasonable or unduly harsh.
Deadline: 5 business days of the determination
Grounds for appeal:
Drawn directly from UT Rules of Conduct (Chapter 1720-04-03); Hilltopics Student Handbook (Chapter 1720-04-03).
UT codifies one of the narrowest academic penalty appeal grounds in the country: ONLY 'unreasonable or unduly harsh' penalties can be appealed, procedural error and new evidence are not stand-alone grounds
UAPA hearings are a distinctive feature for serious cases (deferred suspension or greater), conducted by an administrative law judge with attorney advocacy permitted on both sides. This is closer to a court-like proceeding than most university processes
Alternative resolution options include mediation, facilitated dialogue, conflict coaching, and restorative justice, explicitly codified options for non-adjudicative resolution
Resolution Option Form within 5 business days requires the student to choose the resolution pathway quickly, missing the window has consequences
Academic penalty appeals go to the department head, the course's academic unit, not a central office
Cheating on exams or assessments
Plagiarism on written work
Unauthorized collaboration on individual assignments
Fabrication of data or sources
Unauthorized AI use on graded work
Multiple submission of the same work without permission
Facilitating academic dishonesty by another student
UT Knoxville Office of Title IX / Office for Civil Rights Equality
Sex-based misconduct handled through UT Knoxville's Title IX office.
UT Knoxville is Tennessee's flagship public research university and an SEC member. The UAPA hearing option for serious cases, with attorneys permitted and an administrative law judge, is highly unusual and shifts the process closer to a formal legal proceeding. The narrow 'unreasonable or unduly harsh' appeal ground for academic penalties is equally distinctive.
Hearing preparation for UT Rules of Conduct (Chapter 1720-04-03); Hilltopics Student Handbook cases, including plagiarism, cheating, and unauthorized AI use.
Learn more →Strategic coaching and preparation for presenting your case before Student Conduct & Community Standards (SCCS); UAPA hearing (for deferred suspension or greater).
Learn more →Building a compelling appeal through Tennessee's appellate process on the grounds that fit your case.
Learn more →Navigating UT Knoxville Office of Title IX / Office for Civil Rights Equality investigations and hearings.
Learn more →Topic-specific guides that cover the situations Tennessee students most commonly face.
Student Conduct & Community Standards (SCCS); UAPA hearing (for deferred suspension or greater) (SCCS) has jurisdiction over academic misconduct matters at Tennessee. UT Knoxville administers conduct through SCCS. For cases with recommended sanctions of deferred suspension or greater, a Uniform Administrative Procedures Act (UAPA) hearing is available, conducted by an administrative law judge with attorneys permitted to advocate for both parties. Academic dishonesty appeals go to the head of the department in which the course is located. All undergraduate conduct and academic dishonesty violations at UT Knoxville under Chapter 1720-04-03 Rules of Conduct.
Tennessee applies Preponderance of the evidence under UT Rules of Conduct (Chapter 1720-04-03); Hilltopics Student Handbook (Chapter 1720-04-03). Student Conduct & Community Standards (SCCS); UAPA hearing (for deferred suspension or greater) uses this standard when determining whether a student is responsible for an alleged violation. The evidence standard is critical because it determines how strong the evidence must be before a finding of responsibility can be made.
Under UT Rules of Conduct (Chapter 1720-04-03); Hilltopics Student Handbook, students facing a Student Conduct & Community Standards (SCCS); UAPA hearing (for deferred suspension or greater) proceeding have specific procedural rights, including the right to an informal opportunity to respond before any formal process; receive documents and a Resolution Option Form; choose the resolution option within 5 business days; a UAPA hearing with administrative law judge and attorney representation for deferred suspension or greater. Exercising these rights correctly from the first notice can materially affect the outcome of your case.
If a professor believes a student engaged in academic misconduct, the professor provides the student an informal opportunity to respond. The instructor gathers information, documents the incident, analyzes it, and decides whether to move forward. Students receive documents and are expected to carefully review them and sign the Resolution Option Form within 5 business days.
Student Conduct & Community Standards (SCCS); UAPA hearing (for deferred suspension or greater) can impose a range of sanctions depending on the violation, including academic penalty imposed by instructor, alternative resolutions, disciplinary probation, and more serious outcomes including suspension and expulsion. The specific sanction depends on the facts, the student's prior record, and any mitigating factors presented during the proceeding. Sanction-phase advocacy is often as important as the responsibility phase, since even a first finding can carry long-term consequences on transcripts and graduate school applications.
The appeal deadline at Tennessee is 5 business days of the determination. A student may appeal the imposition of an academic penalty by submitting an appeal in writing to the head of the department in which the course is located within 5 business days. The appeal must specify reasons, but the ONLY ground is that the penalty is unreasonable or unduly harsh. Appeal grounds typically include the academic penalty is unreasonable or unduly harsh. Appeals that succeed are usually the ones that ground each argument in the record and the specific policy language, not emotional or general objections.
In most cases, no. Tennessee's proceedings follow university policy under UT Rules of Conduct (Chapter 1720-04-03); Hilltopics Student Handbook, not the legal system. What you need is someone who understands Tennessee's specific procedures, the evidence standard, and how sanctions are assessed. An education advocate typically provides stronger, more targeted guidance than a general-practice attorney because the body of law here is university policy, not criminal or civil procedure. AdvocatED brings deep, specialized expertise in these exact processes at a fraction of a law firm's cost.
Tennessee handles Title IX matters separately from general academic misconduct, through the UT Knoxville Office of Title IX / Office for Civil Rights Equality. Sex-based misconduct handled through UT Knoxville's Title IX office. Title IX proceedings have their own procedures, evidence standards, and timelines. If you are a respondent in a Title IX case at Tennessee, you should not conflate the process with general conduct cases, and you should respond carefully to any notice you receive.
At Tennessee, the most frequently cited violations include: cheating on exams or assessments; plagiarism on written work; unauthorized collaboration on individual assignments; fabrication of data or sources. Knowing which violation is alleged is the foundation of an effective defense, because the response strategy differs substantially based on whether the case involves plagiarism, AI use, exam cheating, collaboration, or a procedural technicality.
At Tennessee, the most consequential deadlines are: Resolution Option Form signing: 5 business days; Academic penalty appeal: 5 business days of determination. Missing any of these windows can eliminate procedural options that are otherwise available. If you have received a notice from Student Conduct & Community Standards (SCCS); UAPA hearing (for deferred suspension or greater), document the dates on the notice immediately and calendar every deadline, even ones that do not seem urgent.
The procedural details on this page come directly from Tennessee's own published policies and official university resources.
Get your free case review today. We respond quickly and prioritize urgent cases, because we know Tennessee's deadlines don't wait.