North Carolina · Public University
Facing a UNC Honor System, Honor Court (Undergraduate and Graduate & Professional branches) proceeding? AdvocatED advisors know UNC's specific process under UNC Honor Code, Instrument of Student Judicial Governance.
If you just received notice
Governing Policy
Preponderance of the evidence (UNC's standard in Honor Court proceedings, as documented in the Instrument of Student Judicial Governance)
All alleged violations of the UNC Honor Code by students, covering both academic and non-academic misconduct. Jurisdiction is split between the Undergraduate branch and the Graduate & Professional Schools branch.
Who Decides Your Case
The Honor System has two branches: the Undergraduate branch and the Graduate & Professional Schools branch. Each branch has three sub-branches: the Attorney General's Staff (investigates), the Honor Court (adjudicates), and Honor System Outreach (educates). The Honor Court is a student-run body of elected student justices. Expedited hearings (when a student pleads guilty) are heard by three Honor Court members; standard hearings are heard by larger panels.
After a complaint is submitted about a suspected violation, the Honor System process begins with an investigation directed by the Student Attorney General. The Attorney General, along with their staff, will charge the accused student if they deem the behavior to violate the Honor Code. The accused student then chooses between an expedited process (if pleading guilty) or a standard Honor Court hearing.
For students who plead guilty, the expedited process is heard by three Honor Court members. For contested cases, the standard Honor Court hearing proceeds before a larger panel of elected student justices. Honor Court members hear evidence, deliberate, and determine responsibility and sanctions. The student-run nature of the Court means peers make the factual and sanction determinations, guided by the Instrument of Student Judicial Governance.
An appeal process is available following the resolution of a student's case. Appeals may be overturned by the Office of Student Conduct. Appeals must be submitted within 5 days of the Honor Court's ruling.
Deadline: 5 days after the Honor Court's ruling
Grounds for appeal:
Drawn directly from UNC Honor Code, Instrument of Student Judicial Governance.
UNC runs one of the largest student-run honor systems in the United States, investigation, prosecution, and adjudication are all handled by elected students through the Attorney General's Staff and Honor Court structure
The Honor System splits cleanly into Undergraduate and Graduate & Professional Schools branches, with separate courts and staff, graduate students are not heard by undergraduate peers
An expedited hearing before just three Honor Court members is available when the student pleads guilty, a significant procedural acceleration option
Each branch has three sub-branches, Attorney General's Staff (investigative), Honor Court (adjudicative), and Outreach (educational), formalizing the separation of functions within student governance
Appeals must be submitted within 5 days of the Honor Court ruling, tight by peer-institution standards (many allow 10 days)
The governing document is the Instrument of Student Judicial Governance (amended July 25, 2017), reflecting student-driven governance of the Code itself
Plagiarism on written work
Cheating on exams or quizzes
Unauthorized collaboration on individual assignments
Fabrication of data or sources
Unauthorized AI use on graded work
Multiple submission of the same work without permission
Lying or misrepresentation in academic contexts
Stealing or tampering with academic work or materials
Non-academic misconduct violations (alcohol, drugs, disorderly conduct, etc.)
Professional and graduate programs often have their own adjudication bodies, separate from the main university conduct process.
UNC Law School Code of Academic Integrity
Law students fall under the Graduate & Professional Schools branch but also face Law School-specific integrity procedures.
UNC School of Medicine Student Progress and Promotions Committee
Medical students face academic progression and professionalism review through the School of Medicine.
Graduate School academic integrity procedures and Graduate & Professional Honor Court
Graduate students are heard by the Graduate & Professional Schools branch rather than the Undergraduate Honor Court.
UNC Equal Opportunity and Compliance Office (Title IX Coordinator)
Sex-based misconduct and Title IX complaints are handled through the Equal Opportunity and Compliance Office under UNC's separate Title IX policies, not through the Honor Court.
UNC Chapel Hill is the flagship of the University of North Carolina system and one of the oldest public universities in the United States (chartered 1789). The fully student-run Honor System, with elected peers investigating, prosecuting, and adjudicating violations under the Instrument of Student Judicial Governance, is a defining feature of UNC's institutional culture and gives students meaningful peer governance but also means the process has a strong student-community-norms orientation that differs from administrator-led systems.
Hearing preparation for UNC Honor Code, Instrument of Student Judicial Governance cases, including plagiarism, cheating, and unauthorized AI use.
Learn more →Strategic coaching and preparation for presenting your case before UNC Honor System, Honor Court (Undergraduate and Graduate & Professional branches).
Learn more →Building a compelling appeal through UNC's appellate process on the grounds that fit your case.
Learn more →Navigating UNC Equal Opportunity and Compliance Office (Title IX Coordinator) investigations and hearings.
Learn more →Topic-specific guides that cover the situations UNC students most commonly face.
UNC Honor System, Honor Court (Undergraduate and Graduate & Professional branches) has jurisdiction over academic misconduct matters at UNC. The Honor System has two branches: the Undergraduate branch and the Graduate & Professional Schools branch. Each branch has three sub-branches: the Attorney General's Staff (investigates), the Honor Court (adjudicates), and Honor System Outreach (educates). The Honor Court is a student-run body of elected student justices. Expedited hearings (when a student pleads guilty) are heard by three Honor Court members; standard hearings are heard by larger panels. All alleged violations of the UNC Honor Code by students, covering both academic and non-academic misconduct. Jurisdiction is split between the Undergraduate branch and the Graduate & Professional Schools branch.
UNC applies Preponderance of the evidence (UNC's standard in Honor Court proceedings, as documented in the Instrument of Student Judicial Governance) under UNC Honor Code, Instrument of Student Judicial Governance. UNC Honor System, Honor Court (Undergraduate and Graduate & Professional branches) uses this standard when determining whether a student is responsible for an alleged violation. The evidence standard is critical because it determines how strong the evidence must be before a finding of responsibility can be made.
Under UNC Honor Code, Instrument of Student Judicial Governance, students facing a UNC Honor System, Honor Court (Undergraduate and Graduate & Professional branches) proceeding have specific procedural rights, including the right to written notice of the investigation and any charges filed by the Student Attorney General; choose between an expedited hearing (when pleading guilty) and a standard Honor Court hearing; a student-run peer Honor Court adjudication; present evidence and respond to allegations at the hearing. Exercising these rights correctly from the first notice can materially affect the outcome of your case.
After a complaint is submitted about a suspected violation, the Honor System process begins with an investigation directed by the Student Attorney General. The Attorney General, along with their staff, will charge the accused student if they deem the behavior to violate the Honor Code. The accused student then chooses between an expedited process (if pleading guilty) or a standard Honor Court hearing.
UNC Honor System, Honor Court (Undergraduate and Graduate & Professional branches) can impose a range of sanctions depending on the violation, including warning or reprimand, disciplinary probation, loss of privileges, and more serious outcomes including suspension and expulsion. The specific sanction depends on the facts, the student's prior record, and any mitigating factors presented during the proceeding. Sanction-phase advocacy is often as important as the responsibility phase, since even a first finding can carry long-term consequences on transcripts and graduate school applications.
The appeal deadline at UNC is 5 days after the Honor Court's ruling. An appeal process is available following the resolution of a student's case. Appeals may be overturned by the Office of Student Conduct. Appeals must be submitted within 5 days of the Honor Court's ruling. Appeal grounds typically include lack of sufficient evidence to support the honor court's decision, violation of the student's rights during the proceeding, severity of sanctions disproportionate to the violation found. Appeals that succeed are usually the ones that ground each argument in the record and the specific policy language, not emotional or general objections.
In most cases, no. UNC's proceedings follow university policy under UNC Honor Code, Instrument of Student Judicial Governance, not the legal system. What you need is someone who understands UNC's specific procedures, the evidence standard, and how sanctions are assessed. An education advocate typically provides stronger, more targeted guidance than a general-practice attorney because the body of law here is university policy, not criminal or civil procedure. AdvocatED brings deep, specialized expertise in these exact processes at a fraction of a law firm's cost.
UNC handles Title IX matters separately from general academic misconduct, through the UNC Equal Opportunity and Compliance Office (Title IX Coordinator). Sex-based misconduct and Title IX complaints are handled through the Equal Opportunity and Compliance Office under UNC's separate Title IX policies, not through the Honor Court. Title IX proceedings have their own procedures, evidence standards, and timelines. If you are a respondent in a Title IX case at UNC, you should not conflate the process with general conduct cases, and you should respond carefully to any notice you receive.
Yes. UNC School of Law at UNC is handled through UNC Law School Code of Academic Integrity, which is distinct from the general university conduct process. Law students fall under the Graduate & Professional Schools branch but also face Law School-specific integrity procedures. This matters because professional school findings carry licensure implications, and the remediation and appeal pathways are different from the undergraduate process.
At UNC, the most frequently cited violations include: plagiarism on written work; cheating on exams or quizzes; unauthorized collaboration on individual assignments; fabrication of data or sources. Knowing which violation is alleged is the foundation of an effective defense, because the response strategy differs substantially based on whether the case involves plagiarism, AI use, exam cheating, collaboration, or a procedural technicality.
At UNC, the most consequential deadlines are: Appeal: within 5 days of the Honor Court's ruling. Missing any of these windows can eliminate procedural options that are otherwise available. If you have received a notice from UNC Honor System, Honor Court (Undergraduate and Graduate & Professional branches), document the dates on the notice immediately and calendar every deadline, even ones that do not seem urgent.
The procedural details on this page come directly from UNC's own published policies and official university resources.
Get your free case review today. We respond quickly and prioritize urgent cases, because we know UNC's deadlines don't wait.