Texas · Private University
Facing a Office of Academic Integrity; Honor Council proceeding? AdvocatED advisors know Baylor's specific process under Baylor University Honor Code.
If you just received notice
Governing Policy
Preponderance of the evidence
All Baylor academic dishonesty violations under the Baylor University Honor Code.
Who Decides Your Case
Baylor administers academic integrity through the Office of Academic Integrity. Faculty may either handle matters directly with the student OR refer cases to the Honor Council. The philosophy is rooted in fostering academic integrity within a distinctly Christian environment.
In addressing an alleged violation, the faculty member may either handle the matter directly with the accused student or refer the case to the Honor Council. Violations being referred to the Honor Council must be referred within 21 days of discovery.
Students must notify the Office of Academic Integrity within 10 calendar days if they wish to refer the matter to the Honor Council for a hearing. To contest only the sanction, a student must refer the case for a hearing within 21 days of receiving the email from the Office.
Students have two distinct windows: 10 calendar days to request Honor Council referral generally, OR 21 days to contest only the sanction via Honor Council hearing. Faculty have 21 days from discovery to refer cases to the Honor Council.
Deadline: 10 calendar days for Honor Council referral; 21 days for sanction-only contest
Grounds for appeal:
Drawn directly from Baylor University Honor Code.
Baylor's academic integrity process is rooted in its distinctly Christian institutional mission, the Office of Academic Integrity's philosophy is explicitly tied to Baylor's religious identity
AI-system-generated work is EXPLICITLY prohibited as a violation of the Honor Code, one of the clearest AI prohibitions in policy text
Two distinct contest windows: 10 calendar days for Honor Council referral (all issues), OR 21 days for sanction-only contest. Students must choose the right window for their concern
Faculty have a 21-day referral window from discovery, missing this forecloses Honor Council referral
Immediate expulsion is codified as a possible sanction for serious violations, language emphasizes severity for serious misconduct
Offering as one's own work the work of another (including AI-generated work)
Plagiarism, incorporating passages from another's work without proper citation
Cheating on exams or assessments
Unauthorized collaboration on individual assignments
Fabrication of data or sources
Multiple submission of the same work without permission
Facilitating academic dishonesty by another student
Baylor University Office of Access and Learning Accommodation / Title IX Office
Sex-based misconduct handled through Baylor's Title IX office.
Baylor University is a private Christian research university in Waco, Texas and a Big 12 member. The Honor Code's explicit grounding in the Christian institutional mission, the clear AI prohibition, and the dual contest windows (10 vs. 21 days) create a distinctive structured approach.
Hearing preparation for Baylor University Honor Code cases, including plagiarism, cheating, and unauthorized AI use.
Learn more →Strategic coaching and preparation for presenting your case before Office of Academic Integrity; Honor Council.
Learn more →Building a compelling appeal through Baylor's appellate process on the grounds that fit your case.
Learn more →Navigating Baylor University Office of Access and Learning Accommodation / Title IX Office investigations and hearings.
Learn more →Topic-specific guides that cover the situations Baylor students most commonly face.
Office of Academic Integrity; Honor Council has jurisdiction over academic misconduct matters at Baylor. Baylor administers academic integrity through the Office of Academic Integrity. Faculty may either handle matters directly with the student OR refer cases to the Honor Council. The philosophy is rooted in fostering academic integrity within a distinctly Christian environment. All Baylor academic dishonesty violations under the Baylor University Honor Code.
Baylor applies Preponderance of the evidence under Baylor University Honor Code. Office of Academic Integrity; Honor Council uses this standard when determining whether a student is responsible for an alleged violation. The evidence standard is critical because it determines how strong the evidence must be before a finding of responsibility can be made.
Under Baylor University Honor Code, students facing a Office of Academic Integrity; Honor Council proceeding have specific procedural rights, including the right to faculty-only resolution OR Honor Council referral; notify OAI within 10 calendar days of wanting Honor Council hearing; contest only the sanction via Honor Council hearing within 21 days of OAI email; an advisor during proceedings. Exercising these rights correctly from the first notice can materially affect the outcome of your case.
In addressing an alleged violation, the faculty member may either handle the matter directly with the accused student or refer the case to the Honor Council. Violations being referred to the Honor Council must be referred within 21 days of discovery.
Office of Academic Integrity; Honor Council can impose a range of sanctions depending on the violation, including failure of the assignment, grade penalties, disciplinary probation, and more serious outcomes including suspension and expulsion. The specific sanction depends on the facts, the student's prior record, and any mitigating factors presented during the proceeding. Sanction-phase advocacy is often as important as the responsibility phase, since even a first finding can carry long-term consequences on transcripts and graduate school applications.
The appeal deadline at Baylor is 10 calendar days for Honor Council referral; 21 days for sanction-only contest. Students have two distinct windows: 10 calendar days to request Honor Council referral generally, OR 21 days to contest only the sanction via Honor Council hearing. Faculty have 21 days from discovery to refer cases to the Honor Council. Appeal grounds typically include procedural error affecting the outcome, new information not reasonably available at the time of the original decision, sanction disproportionate to the finding. Appeals that succeed are usually the ones that ground each argument in the record and the specific policy language, not emotional or general objections.
Yes. Under Baylor University Honor Code, students have the right to an advisor during proceedings. AdvocatED can serve as that advisor and help you prepare your response, question witnesses where allowed, and navigate Baylor's specific procedural rules. What an advisor can and cannot do varies from school to school, and at Baylor the rules are set out in the governing policy.
In most cases, no. Baylor's proceedings follow university policy under Baylor University Honor Code, not the legal system. What you need is someone who understands Baylor's specific procedures, the evidence standard, and how sanctions are assessed. An education advocate typically provides stronger, more targeted guidance than a general-practice attorney because the body of law here is university policy, not criminal or civil procedure. AdvocatED brings deep, specialized expertise in these exact processes at a fraction of a law firm's cost.
Baylor handles Title IX matters separately from general academic misconduct, through the Baylor University Office of Access and Learning Accommodation / Title IX Office. Sex-based misconduct handled through Baylor's Title IX office. Title IX proceedings have their own procedures, evidence standards, and timelines. If you are a respondent in a Title IX case at Baylor, you should not conflate the process with general conduct cases, and you should respond carefully to any notice you receive.
At Baylor, the most frequently cited violations include: offering as one's own work the work of another (including ai-generated work); plagiarism, incorporating passages from another's work without proper citation; cheating on exams or assessments; unauthorized collaboration on individual assignments. Knowing which violation is alleged is the foundation of an effective defense, because the response strategy differs substantially based on whether the case involves plagiarism, AI use, exam cheating, collaboration, or a procedural technicality.
At Baylor, the most consequential deadlines are: Faculty referral to Honor Council: within 21 days of discovery; Student request for Honor Council hearing: 10 calendar days of OAI email; Sanction-only contest via Honor Council: 21 days of OAI email. Missing any of these windows can eliminate procedural options that are otherwise available. If you have received a notice from Office of Academic Integrity; Honor Council, document the dates on the notice immediately and calendar every deadline, even ones that do not seem urgent.
The procedural details on this page come directly from Baylor's own published policies and official university resources.
Get your free case review today. We respond quickly and prioritize urgent cases, because we know Baylor's deadlines don't wait.