Florida · Public University
Facing a Student Conduct and Academic Integrity (SCAI) / Student Conduct Board proceeding? AdvocatED advisors know UCF's specific process under UCF Golden Rule Student Handbook.
If you just received notice
Governing Policy
Preponderance of the evidence (UCF's standard for Rules of Conduct findings)
All alleged violations of UCF's Golden Rule Student Handbook, covering both academic integrity (Rules of Conduct 1) and non-academic conduct. SCAI oversees the full range of Rules of Conduct proceedings.
Who Decides Your Case
UCF's process is administered by the Student Conduct and Academic Integrity (SCAI) office. Formal hearings are heard by a Student Conduct Board, whose members review the case and make recommendations to the SCAI Director regarding responsibility and sanctions. For appeals, the Vice President for Student Success and Well-Being (or designee) serves as the single appellate officer.
At the initial meeting, the student meets with a SCAI staff member to discuss the alleged violation, share information, and view the office's received information. The staff member explains the process and resolution options. Cases that are not too egregious and where the student accepts responsibility may be resolved informally. Contested or more serious cases proceed to a formal hearing before the Student Conduct Board.
At a formal hearing, Student Conduct Board members hear the case and make recommendations to the SCAI Director regarding responsibility and, if found in violation, recommended sanctions. The Director makes the final decision on responsibility and sanctions. Students who choose informal administrative resolution are not eligible to appeal the final decision, this is a key procedural tradeoff.
Only students who participate in the formal hearing process may appeal a disciplinary decision. UCF has one level of appeal, the appellate officer is the Vice President for Student Success and Well-Being or designee. Students who chose informal administrative resolution are not eligible to appeal.
Grounds for appeal:
Drawn directly from UCF Golden Rule Student Handbook.
UCF publishes a six-level punitive sanction ladder (Warning → Probation → Deferred Suspension → Suspension → Dismissal → Expulsion), one of the more clearly-tiered sanction structures in higher education
Choosing informal resolution waives appeal rights entirely, a major procedural tradeoff students must understand before accepting responsibility informally
UCF has only one level of appeal, to the Vice President for Student Success and Well-Being, there is no intermediate committee review
The Golden Rule Student Handbook is the single governing document for both academic integrity and non-academic conduct, administered through one office (SCAI)
Student Conduct Board recommendations go to the SCAI Director for final decision-making, the Board advises, the Director decides
As one of the largest universities in the US by enrollment, UCF processes high volumes of cases; the Director-as-final-decision-maker model is designed for that scale
Plagiarism on written work
Cheating on exams or quizzes
Unauthorized collaboration on individual assignments
Fabrication of data or sources
Unauthorized AI use on graded work
Disruption of University activities
Alcohol and drug policy violations
Sexual misconduct (also subject to separate Title IX procedures)
Harassment and threatening behavior
Professional and graduate programs often have their own adjudication bodies, separate from the main university conduct process.
UCF College of Medicine Student Evaluation and Promotions Committee
Medical students face academic progression and professionalism review through the College of Medicine.
UCF College of Nursing Academic Standards Committee
Nursing students face additional professional standards review within the College of Nursing.
UCF Office of Institutional Equity (Title IX Coordinator)
Sex-based misconduct and Title IX complaints are handled through the Office of Institutional Equity under UCF's Title IX Policy, separately from SCAI's general Rules of Conduct process.
UCF is one of the largest universities in the United States by enrollment, located in Orlando. The concentration of the entire conduct process under a single office (SCAI) with a single director as final decision-maker, plus a single-level appeal to the Vice President, reflects UCF's operational scale and need for consistent, centralized adjudication.
Hearing preparation for UCF Golden Rule Student Handbook cases, including plagiarism, cheating, and unauthorized AI use.
Learn more →Strategic coaching and preparation for presenting your case before Student Conduct and Academic Integrity (SCAI) / Student Conduct Board.
Learn more →Building a compelling appeal through UCF's appellate process on the grounds that fit your case.
Learn more →Navigating UCF Office of Institutional Equity (Title IX Coordinator) investigations and hearings.
Learn more →Topic-specific guides that cover the situations UCF students most commonly face.
Student Conduct and Academic Integrity (SCAI) / Student Conduct Board (SCAI) has jurisdiction over academic misconduct matters at UCF. UCF's process is administered by the Student Conduct and Academic Integrity (SCAI) office. Formal hearings are heard by a Student Conduct Board, whose members review the case and make recommendations to the SCAI Director regarding responsibility and sanctions. For appeals, the Vice President for Student Success and Well-Being (or designee) serves as the single appellate officer. All alleged violations of UCF's Golden Rule Student Handbook, covering both academic integrity (Rules of Conduct 1) and non-academic conduct. SCAI oversees the full range of Rules of Conduct proceedings.
UCF applies Preponderance of the evidence (UCF's standard for Rules of Conduct findings) under UCF Golden Rule Student Handbook. Student Conduct and Academic Integrity (SCAI) / Student Conduct Board uses this standard when determining whether a student is responsible for an alleged violation. The evidence standard is critical because it determines how strong the evidence must be before a finding of responsibility can be made.
Under UCF Golden Rule Student Handbook, students facing a Student Conduct and Academic Integrity (SCAI) / Student Conduct Board proceeding have specific procedural rights, including the right to an initial meeting with a SCAI staff member to discuss the alleged violation and review received information; choose between informal resolution (accepting responsibility, no appeal) and a formal hearing before the Student Conduct Board; a formal hearing in egregious cases or when the student contests responsibility; an advisor during proceedings. Exercising these rights correctly from the first notice can materially affect the outcome of your case.
At the initial meeting, the student meets with a SCAI staff member to discuss the alleged violation, share information, and view the office's received information. The staff member explains the process and resolution options. Cases that are not too egregious and where the student accepts responsibility may be resolved informally. Contested or more serious cases proceed to a formal hearing before the Student Conduct Board.
Student Conduct and Academic Integrity (SCAI) / Student Conduct Board can impose a range of sanctions depending on the violation, including disciplinary warning, disciplinary probation, disciplinary deferred suspension, and more serious outcomes including suspension and expulsion. The specific sanction depends on the facts, the student's prior record, and any mitigating factors presented during the proceeding. Sanction-phase advocacy is often as important as the responsibility phase, since even a first finding can carry long-term consequences on transcripts and graduate school applications.
Yes. Only students who participate in the formal hearing process may appeal a disciplinary decision. UCF has one level of appeal, the appellate officer is the Vice President for Student Success and Well-Being or designee. Students who chose informal administrative resolution are not eligible to appeal. Appeal grounds typically include severity of sanction, process was not followed, new information available that was not available at the time of the original hearing. The specific appeal deadline is set out in the outcome letter, and it is usually short, often 5 to 10 business days from the date of the decision.
Yes. Under UCF Golden Rule Student Handbook, students have the right to an advisor during proceedings. AdvocatED can serve as that advisor and help you prepare your response, question witnesses where allowed, and navigate UCF's specific procedural rules. What an advisor can and cannot do varies from school to school, and at UCF the rules are set out in the governing policy.
In most cases, no. UCF's proceedings follow university policy under UCF Golden Rule Student Handbook, not the legal system. What you need is someone who understands UCF's specific procedures, the evidence standard, and how sanctions are assessed. An education advocate typically provides stronger, more targeted guidance than a general-practice attorney because the body of law here is university policy, not criminal or civil procedure. AdvocatED brings deep, specialized expertise in these exact processes at a fraction of a law firm's cost.
UCF handles Title IX matters separately from general academic misconduct, through the UCF Office of Institutional Equity (Title IX Coordinator). Sex-based misconduct and Title IX complaints are handled through the Office of Institutional Equity under UCF's Title IX Policy, separately from SCAI's general Rules of Conduct process. Title IX proceedings have their own procedures, evidence standards, and timelines. If you are a respondent in a Title IX case at UCF, you should not conflate the process with general conduct cases, and you should respond carefully to any notice you receive.
Yes. UCF College of Medicine at UCF is handled through UCF College of Medicine Student Evaluation and Promotions Committee, which is distinct from the general university conduct process. Medical students face academic progression and professionalism review through the College of Medicine. This matters because professional school findings carry licensure implications, and the remediation and appeal pathways are different from the undergraduate process.
At UCF, the most frequently cited violations include: plagiarism on written work; cheating on exams or quizzes; unauthorized collaboration on individual assignments; fabrication of data or sources. Knowing which violation is alleged is the foundation of an effective defense, because the response strategy differs substantially based on whether the case involves plagiarism, AI use, exam cheating, collaboration, or a procedural technicality.
At UCF, the most consequential deadlines are: Appeal deadline is specified in the outcome letter for students eligible to appeal (formal hearing track only). Missing any of these windows can eliminate procedural options that are otherwise available. If you have received a notice from Student Conduct and Academic Integrity (SCAI) / Student Conduct Board, document the dates on the notice immediately and calendar every deadline, even ones that do not seem urgent.
The procedural details on this page come directly from UCF's own published policies and official university resources.
Get your free case review today. We respond quickly and prioritize urgent cases, because we know UCF's deadlines don't wait.