North Carolina · Public University
Facing a Office of Student Conduct proceeding? AdvocatED advisors know NC State's specific process under NC State Code of Student Conduct (REG 11.35.05); Student Discipline Procedures (REG 11.35.02); Student Conduct Policy (POL 11.35.01) (REG 11.35.05; REG 11.35.02; POL 11.35.01).
If you just received notice
Governing Policy
Preponderance of the evidence
All alleged violations of the NC State Code of Student Conduct (REG 11.35.05).
Who Decides Your Case
NC State administers conduct through the Office of Student Conduct under the Division of Academic and Student Affairs. Faculty resolve most academic misconduct cases via the Report of an Academic Integrity Violation (RAIV) form; serious cases are adjudicated by the Office of Student Conduct. The Vice Chancellor and Dean of Academic and Student Affairs hears most disciplinary appeals; expulsion appeals go to the Chancellor.
Academic integrity cases usually begin with a meeting between the student and the professor. The student is presented with the allegation and supporting materials. The instructor submits all materials to the Office of Student Conduct using the online Report of an Academic Integrity Violation (RAIV). The student receives an official letter outlining the alleged violation(s) and recommended sanction(s).
Most academic misconduct cases are resolved by the faculty member at the course level via the RAIV. For contested cases or those requiring formal review, the Office of Student Conduct adjudicates. Students found responsible for Academic Misconduct are placed on Academic Integrity Probation for no less than one calendar year.
Any disciplinary decision (other than expulsion or where the student has waived appeal rights) may be appealed to the Vice Chancellor and Dean of Academic and Student Affairs or designees. Expulsion decisions may be appealed to the Chancellor, whose decision is final.
Grounds for appeal:
Drawn directly from NC State Code of Student Conduct (REG 11.35.05); Student Discipline Procedures (REG 11.35.02); Student Conduct Policy (POL 11.35.01) (REG 11.35.05; REG 11.35.02; POL 11.35.01).
NC State codifies a MINIMUM sanction, Academic Integrity Probation for at least 1 calendar year, for ANY finding of responsibility. No warning-only outcomes
The RAIV (Report of an Academic Integrity Violation) is a standardized online form, all cases flow through this single reporting mechanism
Expulsion appeals go directly to the Chancellor, the University's highest officer, with a final decision
Three regulations govern the process (REG 11.35.05 Code, REG 11.35.02 Procedures, POL 11.35.01 Policy), multi-regulation framework gives the process formal weight
Most academic misconduct cases are resolved by the faculty member at the course level, not by formal committee. Escalation is the exception
Cheating on exams or assessments
Plagiarism on written work
Aiding another student to cheat or plagiarize
Unauthorized collaboration on individual assignments
Fabrication of data or sources
Unauthorized AI use on graded work
Multiple submission of the same work without permission
NC State Office for Institutional Equity and Diversity / Title IX Coordinator
Sex-based misconduct handled through NC State's Title IX office.
NC State is North Carolina's land-grant public research university in Raleigh and an ACC member. The codified minimum 1-year Academic Integrity Probation and the Chancellor-level final decision on expulsion appeals create a structured, formally regulated process.
Hearing preparation for NC State Code of Student Conduct (REG 11.35.05); Student Discipline Procedures (REG 11.35.02); Student Conduct Policy (POL 11.35.01) cases, including plagiarism, cheating, and unauthorized AI use.
Learn more →Strategic coaching and preparation for presenting your case before Office of Student Conduct.
Learn more →Building a compelling appeal through NC State's appellate process on the grounds that fit your case.
Learn more →Navigating NC State Office for Institutional Equity and Diversity / Title IX Coordinator investigations and hearings.
Learn more →Topic-specific guides that cover the situations NC State students most commonly face.
Office of Student Conduct has jurisdiction over academic misconduct matters at NC State. NC State administers conduct through the Office of Student Conduct under the Division of Academic and Student Affairs. Faculty resolve most academic misconduct cases via the Report of an Academic Integrity Violation (RAIV) form; serious cases are adjudicated by the Office of Student Conduct. The Vice Chancellor and Dean of Academic and Student Affairs hears most disciplinary appeals; expulsion appeals go to the Chancellor. All alleged violations of the NC State Code of Student Conduct (REG 11.35.05).
NC State applies Preponderance of the evidence under NC State Code of Student Conduct (REG 11.35.05); Student Discipline Procedures (REG 11.35.02); Student Conduct Policy (POL 11.35.01) (REG 11.35.05; REG 11.35.02; POL 11.35.01). Office of Student Conduct uses this standard when determining whether a student is responsible for an alleged violation. The evidence standard is critical because it determines how strong the evidence must be before a finding of responsibility can be made.
Under NC State Code of Student Conduct (REG 11.35.05); Student Discipline Procedures (REG 11.35.02); Student Conduct Policy (POL 11.35.01), students facing a Office of Student Conduct proceeding have specific procedural rights, including the right to a meeting with the professor at the start; be presented with the allegation and supporting materials; receive an official letter outlining the alleged violations and recommended sanctions; an advisor during proceedings. Exercising these rights correctly from the first notice can materially affect the outcome of your case.
Academic integrity cases usually begin with a meeting between the student and the professor. The student is presented with the allegation and supporting materials. The instructor submits all materials to the Office of Student Conduct using the online Report of an Academic Integrity Violation (RAIV). The student receives an official letter outlining the alleged violation(s) and recommended sanction(s).
Office of Student Conduct can impose a range of sanctions depending on the violation, including academic integrity probation for no less than 1 calendar year, behavioral assessments, educational exercises on academic integrity, and more serious outcomes including suspension and expulsion. The specific sanction depends on the facts, the student's prior record, and any mitigating factors presented during the proceeding. Sanction-phase advocacy is often as important as the responsibility phase, since even a first finding can carry long-term consequences on transcripts and graduate school applications.
Yes. Any disciplinary decision (other than expulsion or where the student has waived appeal rights) may be appealed to the Vice Chancellor and Dean of Academic and Student Affairs or designees. Expulsion decisions may be appealed to the Chancellor, whose decision is final. Appeal grounds typically include procedural error affecting the outcome, new information not reasonably available at the time of the hearing, sanction disproportionate to the finding. The specific appeal deadline is set out in the outcome letter, and it is usually short, often 5 to 10 business days from the date of the decision.
Yes. Under NC State Code of Student Conduct (REG 11.35.05); Student Discipline Procedures (REG 11.35.02); Student Conduct Policy (POL 11.35.01), students have the right to an advisor during proceedings. AdvocatED can serve as that advisor and help you prepare your response, question witnesses where allowed, and navigate NC State's specific procedural rules. What an advisor can and cannot do varies from school to school, and at NC State the rules are set out in the governing policy.
In most cases, no. NC State's proceedings follow university policy under NC State Code of Student Conduct (REG 11.35.05); Student Discipline Procedures (REG 11.35.02); Student Conduct Policy (POL 11.35.01), not the legal system. What you need is someone who understands NC State's specific procedures, the evidence standard, and how sanctions are assessed. An education advocate typically provides stronger, more targeted guidance than a general-practice attorney because the body of law here is university policy, not criminal or civil procedure. AdvocatED brings deep, specialized expertise in these exact processes at a fraction of a law firm's cost.
NC State handles Title IX matters separately from general academic misconduct, through the NC State Office for Institutional Equity and Diversity / Title IX Coordinator. Sex-based misconduct handled through NC State's Title IX office. Title IX proceedings have their own procedures, evidence standards, and timelines. If you are a respondent in a Title IX case at NC State, you should not conflate the process with general conduct cases, and you should respond carefully to any notice you receive.
At NC State, the most frequently cited violations include: cheating on exams or assessments; plagiarism on written work; aiding another student to cheat or plagiarize; unauthorized collaboration on individual assignments. Knowing which violation is alleged is the foundation of an effective defense, because the response strategy differs substantially based on whether the case involves plagiarism, AI use, exam cheating, collaboration, or a procedural technicality.
At NC State, the most consequential deadlines are: Appeal deadlines are specified in the outcome letter per REG 11.35.02. Missing any of these windows can eliminate procedural options that are otherwise available. If you have received a notice from Office of Student Conduct, document the dates on the notice immediately and calendar every deadline, even ones that do not seem urgent.
The procedural details on this page come directly from NC State's own published policies and official university resources.
Get your free case review today. We respond quickly and prioritize urgent cases, because we know NC State's deadlines don't wait.