New York · Private University
Facing a Academic Integrity Office (within the Center for Learning and Student Success, CLASS) proceeding? AdvocatED advisors know Syracuse's specific process under Syracuse University Academic Integrity Policy (effective May 24, 2021).
If you just received notice
Governing Policy
Effective May 24, 2021
Preponderance of the evidence (Syracuse's standard for Academic Integrity findings)
All alleged violations of Syracuse's Academic Integrity Policy (effective May 24, 2021). Non-academic conduct is administered separately by the Office of Community Standards.
Who Decides Your Case
Syracuse's Academic Integrity Office (AIO) sits within the Center for Learning and Student Success (CLASS). AIO administers the Academic Integrity Policy, adjudicates allegations, notifies students of available resources and advising, and informs them of their appeal rights. Each academic integrity case is assigned an advisor from AIO to support the student through the process.
Faculty or other university members report suspected violations to the Academic Integrity Office. AIO reviews the allegation, notifies the student, and assigns an academic integrity advisor to the student as a point of contact. The student and advisor may discuss the allegation privately before responding formally.
AIO administers a student-centered adjudication process that upholds high academic standards. The process includes notification, advising, response, and adjudication. Students are informed of their appeal rights throughout. The specific procedural details, including whether a hearing panel convenes, depend on the severity of the allegation and the specific school's layered procedures.
Students are informed of their appeal rights upon notification of any decision under the Academic Integrity Policy. The specific appellate structure, grounds, and deadlines are set out in the Policy and in the outcome letter.
Grounds for appeal:
Drawn directly from Syracuse University Academic Integrity Policy (effective May 24, 2021).
Syracuse's Academic Integrity Office sits within the Center for Learning and Student Success (CLASS), a deliberately educational rather than purely disciplinary framing, pairing adjudication with academic support resources
Each student is assigned an academic integrity advisor from AIO as a first point of contact for private advising, a distinctive support feature before any formal proceeding
The Academic Integrity Policy was substantially revised effective May 24, 2021, so procedural expectations reflect post-2021 practice
AIO's mission explicitly centers on 'promoting and facilitating campus policies and best practices for integrity' and 'maintaining a transparent student-centered adjudication process', signaling the educational-rather-than-adversarial orientation
Syracuse layers school-specific procedures on top of the AIO-administered university Policy, the School of Architecture, Whitman School of Management, and others have school-level variations
AIO also provides academic integrity education and training through CLASS, integrating prevention with adjudication
Plagiarism on written work
Cheating on exams or assessments
Unauthorized collaboration on individual assignments
Fabrication of data, sources, or research results
Unauthorized AI use on graded work
Multiple submission of the same work without permission
Facilitating academic dishonesty by another student
Misrepresentation in academic contexts
Professional and graduate programs often have their own adjudication bodies, separate from the main university conduct process.
Syracuse Law School Code of Student Academic and Professional Responsibility
Law students are subject to a separate Code administered within the College of Law.
Whitman School academic integrity procedures
Whitman applies the Syracuse Academic Integrity Policy with school-specific procedural layers for business students.
Graduate School academic integrity and dissertation review
Graduate students face additional integrity and dissertation-level review through the Graduate School.
Syracuse University Office of Equal Opportunity, Inclusion, and Resolution Services / Title IX Coordinator
Sex-based misconduct and Title IX complaints are handled through the Office of Equal Opportunity, Inclusion, and Resolution Services under Syracuse's separate Title IX policies, not through the Academic Integrity Office.
Syracuse is a private research university in upstate New York. Its housing of the Academic Integrity Office within the Center for Learning and Student Success, alongside tutoring, academic coaching, and academic integrity education, signals a deliberately educational orientation to integrity adjudication rather than a purely disciplinary framing. The AIO-assigned academic integrity advisor for each case is a distinctive student-support feature.
Hearing preparation for Syracuse University Academic Integrity Policy (effective May 24, 2021) cases, including plagiarism, cheating, and unauthorized AI use.
Learn more →Strategic coaching and preparation for presenting your case before Academic Integrity Office (within the Center for Learning and Student Success, CLASS).
Learn more →Building a compelling appeal through Syracuse's appellate process on the grounds that fit your case.
Learn more →Navigating Syracuse University Office of Equal Opportunity, Inclusion, and Resolution Services / Title IX Coordinator investigations and hearings.
Learn more →Topic-specific guides that cover the situations Syracuse students most commonly face.
Academic Integrity Office (within the Center for Learning and Student Success, CLASS) (AIO / CLASS) has jurisdiction over academic misconduct matters at Syracuse. Syracuse's Academic Integrity Office (AIO) sits within the Center for Learning and Student Success (CLASS). AIO administers the Academic Integrity Policy, adjudicates allegations, notifies students of available resources and advising, and informs them of their appeal rights. Each academic integrity case is assigned an advisor from AIO to support the student through the process. All alleged violations of Syracuse's Academic Integrity Policy (effective May 24, 2021). Non-academic conduct is administered separately by the Office of Community Standards.
Syracuse applies Preponderance of the evidence (Syracuse's standard for Academic Integrity findings) under Syracuse University Academic Integrity Policy (effective May 24, 2021). Academic Integrity Office (within the Center for Learning and Student Success, CLASS) uses this standard when determining whether a student is responsible for an alleged violation. The evidence standard is critical because it determines how strong the evidence must be before a finding of responsibility can be made.
Under Syracuse University Academic Integrity Policy (effective May 24, 2021), students facing a Academic Integrity Office (within the Center for Learning and Student Success, CLASS) proceeding have specific procedural rights, including the right to written notice of the alleged violation; an academic integrity advisor from AIO assigned as a first point of contact for private advising; an advisor (external) during proceedings alongside AIO advisor support; present evidence and respond to allegations. Exercising these rights correctly from the first notice can materially affect the outcome of your case.
Faculty or other university members report suspected violations to the Academic Integrity Office. AIO reviews the allegation, notifies the student, and assigns an academic integrity advisor to the student as a point of contact. The student and advisor may discuss the allegation privately before responding formally.
Academic Integrity Office (within the Center for Learning and Student Success, CLASS) can impose a range of sanctions depending on the violation, including grade reduction on the assignment, failing grade in the course, educational sanctions, and more serious outcomes including suspension and expulsion. The specific sanction depends on the facts, the student's prior record, and any mitigating factors presented during the proceeding. Sanction-phase advocacy is often as important as the responsibility phase, since even a first finding can carry long-term consequences on transcripts and graduate school applications.
Yes. Students are informed of their appeal rights upon notification of any decision under the Academic Integrity Policy. The specific appellate structure, grounds, and deadlines are set out in the Policy and in the outcome letter. Appeal grounds typically include procedural error that affected the outcome, new information not reasonably available at the time of the original decision, sanction disproportionate to the finding. The specific appeal deadline is set out in the outcome letter, and it is usually short, often 5 to 10 business days from the date of the decision.
Yes. Under Syracuse University Academic Integrity Policy (effective May 24, 2021), students have the right to an academic integrity advisor from aio assigned as a first point of contact for private advising. AdvocatED can serve as that advisor and help you prepare your response, question witnesses where allowed, and navigate Syracuse's specific procedural rules. What an advisor can and cannot do varies from school to school, and at Syracuse the rules are set out in the governing policy.
In most cases, no. Syracuse's proceedings follow university policy under Syracuse University Academic Integrity Policy (effective May 24, 2021), not the legal system. What you need is someone who understands Syracuse's specific procedures, the evidence standard, and how sanctions are assessed. An education advocate typically provides stronger, more targeted guidance than a general-practice attorney because the body of law here is university policy, not criminal or civil procedure. AdvocatED brings deep, specialized expertise in these exact processes at a fraction of a law firm's cost.
Syracuse handles Title IX matters separately from general academic misconduct, through the Syracuse University Office of Equal Opportunity, Inclusion, and Resolution Services / Title IX Coordinator. Sex-based misconduct and Title IX complaints are handled through the Office of Equal Opportunity, Inclusion, and Resolution Services under Syracuse's separate Title IX policies, not through the Academic Integrity Office. Title IX proceedings have their own procedures, evidence standards, and timelines. If you are a respondent in a Title IX case at Syracuse, you should not conflate the process with general conduct cases, and you should respond carefully to any notice you receive.
Yes. Syracuse College of Law at Syracuse is handled through Syracuse Law School Code of Student Academic and Professional Responsibility, which is distinct from the general university conduct process. Law students are subject to a separate Code administered within the College of Law. This matters because professional school findings carry licensure implications, and the remediation and appeal pathways are different from the undergraduate process.
At Syracuse, the most frequently cited violations include: plagiarism on written work; cheating on exams or assessments; unauthorized collaboration on individual assignments; fabrication of data, sources, or research results. Knowing which violation is alleged is the foundation of an effective defense, because the response strategy differs substantially based on whether the case involves plagiarism, AI use, exam cheating, collaboration, or a procedural technicality.
At Syracuse, the most consequential deadlines are: Appeal deadlines are specified in the outcome letter per the Academic Integrity Policy. Missing any of these windows can eliminate procedural options that are otherwise available. If you have received a notice from Academic Integrity Office (within the Center for Learning and Student Success, CLASS), document the dates on the notice immediately and calendar every deadline, even ones that do not seem urgent.
The procedural details on this page come directly from Syracuse's own published policies and official university resources.
Get your free case review today. We respond quickly and prioritize urgent cases, because we know Syracuse's deadlines don't wait.