Arizona · Public University
Facing a Dean of Students Office; College Dean (appellate) proceeding? AdvocatED advisors know UArizona's specific process under University of Arizona Code of Academic Integrity.
If you just received notice
Governing Policy
Preponderance of the evidence
All academic integrity violations at the University of Arizona under the Code of Academic Integrity.
Who Decides Your Case
Arizona administers academic integrity through the Dean of Students Office under the Code of Academic Integrity. Faculty confer with students when misconduct is suspected. Appeals go to the College Dean, whose decision is usually final.
When an instructor suspects academic dishonesty, the instructor notifies and confers with the student to gather more information. Procedures under the Code are conducted in a confidential manner. The student has the right to an advisor at all procedures.
The instructor conducts the initial conference. If a Record of Faculty/Student Conference form is filed, the student has 10 academic days to deliver a Request to Appeal form to the College Dean. The College Dean meets separately with the student and instructor, then rules on the case. The appeal process can take up to 30 academic days.
Within 10 academic days of receiving the Record of Faculty/Student Conference form, the student should complete and deliver a Request to Appeal form to the College Dean. The College Dean meets separately with student and instructor, then rules. The process can take up to 30 academic days, and the College Dean's decision is usually final.
Deadline: 10 academic days from Record of Faculty/Student Conference receipt
Grounds for appeal:
Drawn directly from University of Arizona Code of Academic Integrity.
ALL reported students are required to attend an Academic Integrity Workshop, a mandatory universal educational sanction regardless of finding
The transcript notation 'Academic Integrity Violation' is time-limited to the semester the incident occurred, not a permanent mark
Appeals can take up to 30 academic days, a defined upper bound
The College Dean meets separately with student AND instructor, not a joint hearing
The College Dean's decision is usually FINAL, no routine further appeal
Cheating on exams or assessments
Plagiarism on written work
Fabrication of information or citations
Facilitating academic dishonesty by others
Unauthorized possession of examinations
Submitting another person's work or previously-used work without informing the instructor
Tampering with other students' academic work
Unauthorized AI use on graded work
Arizona Office of Institutional Equity / Title IX Coordinator
Sex-based misconduct handled through Arizona's Title IX office.
The University of Arizona is the state's flagship public research university in Tucson and an AAU member. The universal Academic Integrity Workshop requirement for all reported students, the time-limited transcript notation, and the usually-final College Dean appeal decision reflect a structured process with meaningful student-educational orientation.
Hearing preparation for University of Arizona Code of Academic Integrity cases, including plagiarism, cheating, and unauthorized AI use.
Learn more →Strategic coaching and preparation for presenting your case before Dean of Students Office; College Dean (appellate).
Learn more →Building a compelling appeal through UArizona's appellate process on the grounds that fit your case.
Learn more →Navigating Arizona Office of Institutional Equity / Title IX Coordinator investigations and hearings.
Learn more →Topic-specific guides that cover the situations UArizona students most commonly face.
Dean of Students Office; College Dean (appellate) has jurisdiction over academic misconduct matters at UArizona. Arizona administers academic integrity through the Dean of Students Office under the Code of Academic Integrity. Faculty confer with students when misconduct is suspected. Appeals go to the College Dean, whose decision is usually final. All academic integrity violations at the University of Arizona under the Code of Academic Integrity.
UArizona applies Preponderance of the evidence under University of Arizona Code of Academic Integrity. Dean of Students Office; College Dean (appellate) uses this standard when determining whether a student is responsible for an alleged violation. The evidence standard is critical because it determines how strong the evidence must be before a finding of responsibility can be made.
Under University of Arizona Code of Academic Integrity, students facing a Dean of Students Office; College Dean (appellate) proceeding have specific procedural rights, including the right to notification and confer with the instructor; confidentiality in procedures; an advisor in ALL procedures; the Record of Faculty/Student Conference form. Exercising these rights correctly from the first notice can materially affect the outcome of your case.
When an instructor suspects academic dishonesty, the instructor notifies and confers with the student to gather more information. Procedures under the Code are conducted in a confidential manner. The student has the right to an advisor at all procedures.
Dean of Students Office; College Dean (appellate) can impose a range of sanctions depending on the violation, including academic integrity workshop, failing grades, transcript notation: 'academic integrity violation' during the semester the incident occurred, and more serious outcomes including suspension and expulsion. The specific sanction depends on the facts, the student's prior record, and any mitigating factors presented during the proceeding. Sanction-phase advocacy is often as important as the responsibility phase, since even a first finding can carry long-term consequences on transcripts and graduate school applications.
The appeal deadline at UArizona is 10 academic days from Record of Faculty/Student Conference receipt. Within 10 academic days of receiving the Record of Faculty/Student Conference form, the student should complete and deliver a Request to Appeal form to the College Dean. The College Dean meets separately with student and instructor, then rules. The process can take up to 30 academic days, and the College Dean's decision is usually final. Appeal grounds typically include procedural error affecting the outcome, new information not reasonably available at the time of the original decision, sanction disproportionate to the finding. Appeals that succeed are usually the ones that ground each argument in the record and the specific policy language, not emotional or general objections.
Yes. Under University of Arizona Code of Academic Integrity, students have the right to an advisor in all procedures. AdvocatED can serve as that advisor and help you prepare your response, question witnesses where allowed, and navigate UArizona's specific procedural rules. What an advisor can and cannot do varies from school to school, and at UArizona the rules are set out in the governing policy.
In most cases, no. UArizona's proceedings follow university policy under University of Arizona Code of Academic Integrity, not the legal system. What you need is someone who understands UArizona's specific procedures, the evidence standard, and how sanctions are assessed. An education advocate typically provides stronger, more targeted guidance than a general-practice attorney because the body of law here is university policy, not criminal or civil procedure. AdvocatED brings deep, specialized expertise in these exact processes at a fraction of a law firm's cost.
UArizona handles Title IX matters separately from general academic misconduct, through the Arizona Office of Institutional Equity / Title IX Coordinator. Sex-based misconduct handled through Arizona's Title IX office. Title IX proceedings have their own procedures, evidence standards, and timelines. If you are a respondent in a Title IX case at UArizona, you should not conflate the process with general conduct cases, and you should respond carefully to any notice you receive.
At UArizona, the most frequently cited violations include: cheating on exams or assessments; plagiarism on written work; fabrication of information or citations; facilitating academic dishonesty by others. Knowing which violation is alleged is the foundation of an effective defense, because the response strategy differs substantially based on whether the case involves plagiarism, AI use, exam cheating, collaboration, or a procedural technicality.
At UArizona, the most consequential deadlines are: Request to Appeal: 10 academic days from Record form receipt; Appeal resolution: up to 30 academic days. Missing any of these windows can eliminate procedural options that are otherwise available. If you have received a notice from Dean of Students Office; College Dean (appellate), document the dates on the notice immediately and calendar every deadline, even ones that do not seem urgent.
The procedural details on this page come directly from UArizona's own published policies and official university resources.
Get your free case review today. We respond quickly and prioritize urgent cases, because we know UArizona's deadlines don't wait.