New Jersey · Public University
Facing a Office of Student Conduct / Office of Academic Integrity proceeding? AdvocatED advisors know Rutgers's specific process under Rutgers University Academic Integrity Policy (University Policy 10.2.13 (effective June 2, 2020)).
If you just received notice
Governing Policy
Preponderance of the evidence
Violations of the Rutgers University Academic Integrity Policy (covering New Brunswick, Newark, Camden, and RBHS campuses). Non-academic conduct is administered separately under the Rutgers Code of Student Conduct.
Who Decides Your Case
The Rutgers Office of Student Conduct administers the Academic Integrity Policy (effective June 2, 2020). Adjudication depends on the violation level, course-level Level 1/2 cases may be resolved by the instructor, while Level 3 cases (the most serious) are handled by campus-level academic integrity officers. Appeals go to the Campus Appeals Committee (CAC). For sanctions including suspension, expulsion, or an XF grade, the final sanction is determined by the Chief Academic Integrity Officer (CAIO).
The instructor reports an alleged academic integrity violation to the department or campus academic integrity officer, who categorizes the violation into one of three levels. Level 1 and Level 2 violations may be resolved at the course level with instructor-imposed sanctions. Level 3 violations, the most serious, potentially involving professional codes, extreme dishonesty, legal violations, or harm to others, are handled through campus-level review.
For contested cases or more serious violations, the campus academic integrity officer investigates and makes a determination. The student has the right to present evidence and respond. For Level 3 matters or sanctions involving suspension, expulsion, or an XF grade, the decision flows through the Chief Academic Integrity Officer (CAIO) as the final sanctioning authority.
An accused student has the right to appeal any finding and/or sanction. The appeal is submitted to the Campus Appeals Committee (CAC) using the appeal form with supporting documentation. If the sanction affirmed by the CAC includes suspension, expulsion, or an XF grade, the final sanction is determined by the Chief Academic Integrity Officer (CAIO).
Deadline: 10 working days of the decision
Grounds for appeal:
Drawn directly from Rutgers University Academic Integrity Policy (University Policy 10.2.13 (effective June 2, 2020)).
Rutgers' three-level violation classification (Level 1, 2, 3) is explicitly codified in the policy and determines which administrative track a case follows, students can benefit significantly from correctly classifying their case
Level 3 violations reserved for 'professional code violations, extreme dishonesty, legal violations, or harm to others' route directly to campus-level review rather than instructor resolution
The Chief Academic Integrity Officer (CAIO) is the final sanctioning authority for suspension, expulsion, and XF, consolidating high-stakes decisions in one role across campuses
The XF grade (disciplinary F) is a distinct transcript sanction separate from a regular failing grade, creating a visible mark tied specifically to the integrity finding
Rutgers operates a single Academic Integrity Policy across its four geographic campuses (New Brunswick, Newark, Camden, RBHS), but each campus has its own Campus Appeals Committee
The policy was last substantially revised effective June 2, 2020, so procedural expectations reflect post-2020 practice
Plagiarism and improper citation
Unauthorized collaboration on individual assignments
Cheating on exams or assessments
Fabrication of data, sources, or research results
Unauthorized AI use on graded work
Multiple submission of the same work without permission
Facilitating academic dishonesty by another student
Misrepresentation of academic credentials or accomplishments
Professional and graduate programs often have their own adjudication bodies, separate from the main university conduct process.
Rutgers Law School academic regulations and honor procedures
Law students are subject to separate academic regulations administered within the School of Law.
RBHS academic integrity and professional review
Medical, dental, pharmacy, and other RBHS students face additional academic progression and professionalism review beyond the university academic integrity process.
Rutgers Office of Title IX
Sex-based misconduct and Title IX complaints are handled through the Office of Title IX and the University's Title IX policy, separately from the academic integrity process.
Rutgers is the state university of New Jersey, operating four geographic campuses (New Brunswick, Newark, Camden, and RBHS in Newark and Piscataway). The single University Academic Integrity Policy governs all campuses, but campus-level appeals committees create distinct procedural paths that matter for students navigating the process.
Hearing preparation for Rutgers University Academic Integrity Policy cases, including plagiarism, cheating, and unauthorized AI use.
Learn more →Strategic coaching and preparation for presenting your case before Office of Student Conduct / Office of Academic Integrity.
Learn more →Building a compelling appeal through Rutgers's appellate process on the grounds that fit your case.
Learn more →Navigating Rutgers Office of Title IX investigations and hearings.
Learn more →Topic-specific guides that cover the situations Rutgers students most commonly face.
Office of Student Conduct / Office of Academic Integrity has jurisdiction over academic misconduct matters at Rutgers. The Rutgers Office of Student Conduct administers the Academic Integrity Policy (effective June 2, 2020). Adjudication depends on the violation level, course-level Level 1/2 cases may be resolved by the instructor, while Level 3 cases (the most serious) are handled by campus-level academic integrity officers. Appeals go to the Campus Appeals Committee (CAC). For sanctions including suspension, expulsion, or an XF grade, the final sanction is determined by the Chief Academic Integrity Officer (CAIO). Violations of the Rutgers University Academic Integrity Policy (covering New Brunswick, Newark, Camden, and RBHS campuses). Non-academic conduct is administered separately under the Rutgers Code of Student Conduct.
Rutgers applies Preponderance of the evidence under Rutgers University Academic Integrity Policy (University Policy 10.2.13 (effective June 2, 2020)). Office of Student Conduct / Office of Academic Integrity uses this standard when determining whether a student is responsible for an alleged violation. The evidence standard is critical because it determines how strong the evidence must be before a finding of responsibility can be made.
Under Rutgers University Academic Integrity Policy, students facing a Office of Student Conduct / Office of Academic Integrity proceeding have specific procedural rights, including the right to written notice of the alleged violation and the violation level assigned; respond to the allegation and present evidence; an advisor during proceedings; appeal any finding and/or sanction to the Campus Appeals Committee (CAC). Exercising these rights correctly from the first notice can materially affect the outcome of your case.
The instructor reports an alleged academic integrity violation to the department or campus academic integrity officer, who categorizes the violation into one of three levels. Level 1 and Level 2 violations may be resolved at the course level with instructor-imposed sanctions. Level 3 violations, the most serious, potentially involving professional codes, extreme dishonesty, legal violations, or harm to others, are handled through campus-level review.
Office of Student Conduct / Office of Academic Integrity can impose a range of sanctions depending on the violation, including academic penalties, grade of xf, educational sanctions, and more serious outcomes including suspension and expulsion. The specific sanction depends on the facts, the student's prior record, and any mitigating factors presented during the proceeding. Sanction-phase advocacy is often as important as the responsibility phase, since even a first finding can carry long-term consequences on transcripts and graduate school applications.
The appeal deadline at Rutgers is 10 working days of the decision. An accused student has the right to appeal any finding and/or sanction. The appeal is submitted to the Campus Appeals Committee (CAC) using the appeal form with supporting documentation. If the sanction affirmed by the CAC includes suspension, expulsion, or an XF grade, the final sanction is determined by the Chief Academic Integrity Officer (CAIO). Appeal grounds typically include disproportionate sanctions relative to the violation found, new information previously unavailable or unknown at the time of the initial decision, procedural error that affected the outcome. Appeals that succeed are usually the ones that ground each argument in the record and the specific policy language, not emotional or general objections.
Yes. Under Rutgers University Academic Integrity Policy, students have the right to an advisor during proceedings. AdvocatED can serve as that advisor and help you prepare your response, question witnesses where allowed, and navigate Rutgers's specific procedural rules. What an advisor can and cannot do varies from school to school, and at Rutgers the rules are set out in the governing policy.
In most cases, no. Rutgers's proceedings follow university policy under Rutgers University Academic Integrity Policy, not the legal system. What you need is someone who understands Rutgers's specific procedures, the evidence standard, and how sanctions are assessed. An education advocate typically provides stronger, more targeted guidance than a general-practice attorney because the body of law here is university policy, not criminal or civil procedure. AdvocatED brings deep, specialized expertise in these exact processes at a fraction of a law firm's cost.
Rutgers handles Title IX matters separately from general academic misconduct, through the Rutgers Office of Title IX. Sex-based misconduct and Title IX complaints are handled through the Office of Title IX and the University's Title IX policy, separately from the academic integrity process. Title IX proceedings have their own procedures, evidence standards, and timelines. If you are a respondent in a Title IX case at Rutgers, you should not conflate the process with general conduct cases, and you should respond carefully to any notice you receive.
Yes. Rutgers Law School at Rutgers is handled through Rutgers Law School academic regulations and honor procedures, which is distinct from the general university conduct process. Law students are subject to separate academic regulations administered within the School of Law. This matters because professional school findings carry licensure implications, and the remediation and appeal pathways are different from the undergraduate process.
At Rutgers, the most frequently cited violations include: plagiarism and improper citation; unauthorized collaboration on individual assignments; cheating on exams or assessments; fabrication of data, sources, or research results. Knowing which violation is alleged is the foundation of an effective defense, because the response strategy differs substantially based on whether the case involves plagiarism, AI use, exam cheating, collaboration, or a procedural technicality.
At Rutgers, the most consequential deadlines are: Appeal to Campus Appeals Committee: 10 working days from the decision. Missing any of these windows can eliminate procedural options that are otherwise available. If you have received a notice from Office of Student Conduct / Office of Academic Integrity, document the dates on the notice immediately and calendar every deadline, even ones that do not seem urgent.
The procedural details on this page come directly from Rutgers's own published policies and official university resources.
Get your free case review today. We respond quickly and prioritize urgent cases, because we know Rutgers's deadlines don't wait.