Pennsylvania · Public University
Facing a Student Conduct and Community Standards; Student Conduct Board; Appellate Board proceeding? AdvocatED advisors know Temple's specific process under Temple University Student Conduct Code (Policy 03.70.12) (Policy 03.70.12).
If you just received notice
Governing Policy
Preponderance of the evidence
All Temple academic integrity and non-academic conduct violations under the Student Conduct Code.
Who Decides Your Case
Temple administers conduct through Student Conduct and Community Standards under the Student Conduct Code (Policy 03.70.12). Faculty may impose academic sanctions (grade penalties) without referring cases to Student Conduct; Student Code sanctions are adjudicated via Student Conduct Board hearings. Appeals go to an Appellate Board.
Faculty may impose academic sanctions directly (grade reduction, failing grade on assignment or course) without referring to Student Conduct, but they should report the faculty-imposed sanctions. For Student Code sanctions, faculty refer to Student Conduct and Community Standards.
A Student Conduct Board hearing is convened for Code violations. The Student Conduct Administrator advises the accused student in writing of the determination and sanction(s) imposed, along with appeal instructions.
A decision reached by the Student Conduct Board or a sanction imposed by the University Code Administrator may be appealed by the Accused Student to an Appellate Board within 5 school days of the decision. Appeals must be submitted in writing to the Student Conduct Administrator.
Deadline: 5 school days of the decision
Grounds for appeal:
Drawn directly from Temple University Student Conduct Code (Policy 03.70.12) (Policy 03.70.12).
Temple explicitly allows faculty to impose academic sanctions (grade reduction/failure) WITHOUT referring to Student Conduct, faculty just report the sanction. This parallel track means not all academic misconduct cases trigger the formal conduct process
Student Code sanctions are adjudicated through the Student Conduct Board, a separate, more formal process
Appeals go to an Appellate Board, codified separate body from the original Student Conduct Board
The 5-school-day appeal window is tight but standard
Policy 03.70.12 is the codified Student Conduct Code, formal institutional policy
Plagiarism (including use of unacknowledged published/unpublished work, or agency-prepared materials)
Cheating, unauthorized assistance on quizzes, tests, exams; unauthorized sources; acquiring materials without permission; behavior prohibited by faculty in syllabus or class
Fabrication of data or sources
Resubmitting work without prior authorization
Unauthorized AI use on graded work
Facilitating academic dishonesty by another student
Temple Title IX Office
Sex-based misconduct handled through Temple's Title IX office.
Temple University is a large public research university in Philadelphia. The two-track structure (faculty-only academic sanctions vs. Student Conduct Code sanctions) means not all misconduct cases follow the formal process, faculty can resolve grade-level cases without referral.
Hearing preparation for Temple University Student Conduct Code (Policy 03.70.12) cases, including plagiarism, cheating, and unauthorized AI use.
Learn more →Strategic coaching and preparation for presenting your case before Student Conduct and Community Standards; Student Conduct Board; Appellate Board.
Learn more →Building a compelling appeal through Temple's appellate process on the grounds that fit your case.
Learn more →Navigating Temple Title IX Office investigations and hearings.
Learn more →Topic-specific guides that cover the situations Temple students most commonly face.
Student Conduct and Community Standards; Student Conduct Board; Appellate Board has jurisdiction over academic misconduct matters at Temple. Temple administers conduct through Student Conduct and Community Standards under the Student Conduct Code (Policy 03.70.12). Faculty may impose academic sanctions (grade penalties) without referring cases to Student Conduct; Student Code sanctions are adjudicated via Student Conduct Board hearings. Appeals go to an Appellate Board. All Temple academic integrity and non-academic conduct violations under the Student Conduct Code.
Temple applies Preponderance of the evidence under Temple University Student Conduct Code (Policy 03.70.12) (Policy 03.70.12). Student Conduct and Community Standards; Student Conduct Board; Appellate Board uses this standard when determining whether a student is responsible for an alleged violation. The evidence standard is critical because it determines how strong the evidence must be before a finding of responsibility can be made.
Under Temple University Student Conduct Code (Policy 03.70.12), students facing a Student Conduct and Community Standards; Student Conduct Board; Appellate Board proceeding have specific procedural rights, including the right to faculty notification of imposed sanctions (faculty-only track); a Student Conduct Board hearing for Code violations; an advisor during proceedings; present evidence and respond to allegations. Exercising these rights correctly from the first notice can materially affect the outcome of your case.
Faculty may impose academic sanctions directly (grade reduction, failing grade on assignment or course) without referring to Student Conduct, but they should report the faculty-imposed sanctions. For Student Code sanctions, faculty refer to Student Conduct and Community Standards.
Student Conduct and Community Standards; Student Conduct Board; Appellate Board can impose a range of sanctions depending on the violation, including faculty-imposed: grade reduction, student conduct code sanctions: warning, disciplinary probation, and more serious outcomes including suspension and expulsion. The specific sanction depends on the facts, the student's prior record, and any mitigating factors presented during the proceeding. Sanction-phase advocacy is often as important as the responsibility phase, since even a first finding can carry long-term consequences on transcripts and graduate school applications.
The appeal deadline at Temple is 5 school days of the decision. A decision reached by the Student Conduct Board or a sanction imposed by the University Code Administrator may be appealed by the Accused Student to an Appellate Board within 5 school days of the decision. Appeals must be submitted in writing to the Student Conduct Administrator. Appeal grounds typically include procedural error affecting the outcome, new information not reasonably available at the time of the original hearing, sanction disproportionate to the finding. Appeals that succeed are usually the ones that ground each argument in the record and the specific policy language, not emotional or general objections.
Yes. Under Temple University Student Conduct Code (Policy 03.70.12), students have the right to an advisor during proceedings. AdvocatED can serve as that advisor and help you prepare your response, question witnesses where allowed, and navigate Temple's specific procedural rules. What an advisor can and cannot do varies from school to school, and at Temple the rules are set out in the governing policy.
In most cases, no. Temple's proceedings follow university policy under Temple University Student Conduct Code (Policy 03.70.12), not the legal system. What you need is someone who understands Temple's specific procedures, the evidence standard, and how sanctions are assessed. An education advocate typically provides stronger, more targeted guidance than a general-practice attorney because the body of law here is university policy, not criminal or civil procedure. AdvocatED brings deep, specialized expertise in these exact processes at a fraction of a law firm's cost.
Temple handles Title IX matters separately from general academic misconduct, through the Temple Title IX Office. Sex-based misconduct handled through Temple's Title IX office. Title IX proceedings have their own procedures, evidence standards, and timelines. If you are a respondent in a Title IX case at Temple, you should not conflate the process with general conduct cases, and you should respond carefully to any notice you receive.
At Temple, the most frequently cited violations include: plagiarism (including use of unacknowledged published/unpublished work, or agency-prepared materials); cheating, unauthorized assistance on quizzes, tests, exams; unauthorized sources; acquiring materials without permission; behavior prohibited by faculty in syllabus or class; fabrication of data or sources; resubmitting work without prior authorization. Knowing which violation is alleged is the foundation of an effective defense, because the response strategy differs substantially based on whether the case involves plagiarism, AI use, exam cheating, collaboration, or a procedural technicality.
At Temple, the most consequential deadlines are: Appeal to Appellate Board: 5 school days of the decision. Missing any of these windows can eliminate procedural options that are otherwise available. If you have received a notice from Student Conduct and Community Standards; Student Conduct Board; Appellate Board, document the dates on the notice immediately and calendar every deadline, even ones that do not seem urgent.
The procedural details on this page come directly from Temple's own published policies and official university resources.
Get your free case review today. We respond quickly and prioritize urgent cases, because we know Temple's deadlines don't wait.