North Carolina · Public University
University of North Carolina at Charlotte Student Conduct & Academic Misconduct Defense
Facing a Academic Integrity Board proceeding? AdvocatED advisors know UNC Charlotte's specific process under Code of Student Academic Integrity (University Policy 407).
If you just received notice
What to do right now at UNC Charlotte
- 1Note the exact date on your notice letter and mark every deadline it contains on your calendar, at UNC Charlotte, the appeal window is UNVERIFIED: needs human research, and missing a deadline forecloses your options.
- 2Do not respond substantively yet. Before you reply to the Academic Integrity Board, review Code of Student Academic Integrity (University Policy 407) so you know the specific procedure that will be applied to your case.
- 3Identify an advisor who knows UNC Charlotte's specific process. The evidence standard (Preponderance of the evidence, that it is more likely than not that the student engaged in academic misconduct as charged) and appeal grounds are narrow, generic advice is not enough.
- 4Preserve everything related to the allegation, emails, drafts, timestamps, communication with classmates, citations. This evidence often decides the case under Preponderance of the evidence, that it is more likely than not that the student engaged in academic misconduct as charged.
- 5Contact AdvocatED for a free case review before your UNC Charlotte meeting. We'll explain exactly how Academic Integrity Board will approach your case and what response gives you the strongest position.
Governing Policy
Code of Student Academic Integrity · University Policy 407
February 27, 2026
Evidence Standard
Preponderance of the evidence, that it is more likely than not that the student engaged in academic misconduct as charged
Jurisdiction
Academic misconduct cases, including serious first offenses and all second offenses
Who Decides Your Case
Academic Integrity Board (AIB)
Faculty members (increased from twelve to thirteen to account for the addition of the new College of Information Technology, with numbers proportional to full-time faculty with professorial rank in each college) and student members; chaired by a Chair appointed by the Senior Associate Provost
How a UNC Charlotte Case Moves
1. How Cases Begin
Cases are initiated when faculty members or other University community members report suspected academic misconduct to the Director of Student Accountability & Conflict Resolution. The Director determines whether the case should proceed through informal resolution, facilitated resolution, or formal hearing.
2. The Hearing
Cases may be resolved through: (1) Informal Resolution, in which a faculty member resolves a case directly with the student; (2) Facilitated Resolution, in which the Director facilitates discussion between the faculty member and student; or (3) Formal Hearing before a Hearing Panel (which may include an 'Outcome-Only' hearing option when a student takes responsibility but disagrees with proposed outcomes). The University presumes students not responsible for violations until determined otherwise through Academic Misconduct Procedures.
3. Appeals
Students may appeal outcomes of Academic Misconduct cases. Appeals are processed according to procedures outlined in University Policy 407. The appeal process permits reconsideration of the case based on specified grounds.
Deadline: UNVERIFIED: needs human research
Grounds for appeal:
- UNVERIFIED: needs human research
Your Rights at a UNC Charlotte Hearing
- ✓Right to presumption of not responsible until determined otherwise through Academic Misconduct Procedures
- ✓Right to notice of alleged academic misconduct
- ✓Right to be heard and present evidence
- ✓Right to representation by a licensed attorney or non-attorney advocate in formal hearings
- ✓Right to appeal
Sanctions UNC Charlotte Can Impose
Drawn directly from Code of Student Academic Integrity (University Policy 407).
- 1.Reduced grade (including F for undergraduate, U for graduate) for the assignment
- 2.Reduced grade (including F for undergraduate, U for graduate) for the entire course
- 3.Disciplinary Warning (formal written warning indicating unacceptable behavior)
- 4.Disciplinary Probation (status of not being in good Disciplinary Standing for a definite period not less than remainder of semester)
- 5.Suspension
- 6.Expulsion
What Makes UNC Charlotte's Process Distinctive
The Academic Integrity Board includes thirteen faculty members (proportional representation from each college) plus student members
Policy includes specific provisions addressing artificial intelligence in academic work
Graduate Students chapter (Chapter 11) highlights heightened academic integrity responsibilities and expectations for graduate coursework
Research misconduct cases (grant applications, publications, theses/dissertations submitted to ProQuest) are handled separately under University Policy 309
Supports multiple resolution pathways: informal resolution, facilitated resolution, and formal hearings
Common Violations Referred at UNC Charlotte
Plagiarism (presenting the words or ideas of another as one's own without proper source acknowledgment)
Cheating (using or attempting to use unauthorized materials or assistance in academic exercises)
Unauthorized submission of same work in multiple courses
Unauthorized alteration of data or information
Unauthorized sharing, distributing, or acquiring academic materials (including uploading/downloading without authorization to platforms like Chegg, Quizlet, GitHub, Course Hero)
Title IX at UNC Charlotte
Office of Civil Rights and Title IX
Operates under the Division of Institutional Integrity; led by Dr. Michelle Reinken, Assistant Vice Chancellor for Civil Rights and Title IX / Title IX Coordinator. Handles complaints of sexual misconduct, relationship violence, stalking, and related retaliation under University Policies 501, 502, and 504. Separate from academic integrity process. Contact: titleixcoordinator@uncc.edu or 704-687-6130.
Key Deadlines at UNC Charlotte
- ⏱UNVERIFIED: needs human research
UNC Charlotte is a large, young, public urban university that developed its Code of Student Academic Integrity to address academic dishonesty in an environment where traditional honor codes would not be effective. The University emphasizes education and accountability in its student conduct processes, facilitating compassionate conversations consistent with UNC Board of Governors Policy 700.4.2.
How AdvocatED Helps UNC Charlotte Students
Academic Misconduct Defense
Hearing preparation for Code of Student Academic Integrity cases, including plagiarism, cheating, and unauthorized AI use.
Learn more →Conduct Hearing Preparation
Strategic coaching and preparation for presenting your case before Academic Integrity Board.
Learn more →Dismissal & Suspension Appeals
Building a compelling appeal through UNC Charlotte's appellate process on the grounds that fit your case.
Learn more →Title IX Defense
Navigating Office of Civil Rights and Title IX investigations and hearings.
Learn more →UNC Charlotte Resources & Guides
Related guides for UNC Charlotte students
Topic-specific guides that cover the situations UNC Charlotte students most commonly face.
Frequently Asked Questions: UNC Charlotte Students
Who handles academic misconduct cases at UNC Charlotte?
Academic Integrity Board (AIB) has jurisdiction over academic misconduct matters at UNC Charlotte. Faculty members (increased from twelve to thirteen to account for the addition of the new College of Information Technology, with numbers proportional to full-time faculty with professorial rank in each college) and student members; chaired by a Chair appointed by the Senior Associate Provost Academic misconduct cases, including serious first offenses and all second offenses
What is the evidence standard at UNC Charlotte?
UNC Charlotte applies Preponderance of the evidence, that it is more likely than not that the student engaged in academic misconduct as charged under Code of Student Academic Integrity (University Policy 407). Academic Integrity Board uses this standard when determining whether a student is responsible for an alleged violation. The evidence standard is critical because it determines how strong the evidence must be before a finding of responsibility can be made.
What rights do I have during a UNC Charlotte conduct proceeding?
Under Code of Student Academic Integrity, students facing a Academic Integrity Board proceeding have specific procedural rights, including the right to presumption of not responsible until determined otherwise through Academic Misconduct Procedures; notice of alleged academic misconduct; be heard and present evidence; representation by a licensed attorney or non-attorney advocate in formal hearings. Exercising these rights correctly from the first notice can materially affect the outcome of your case.
How is an academic misconduct case initiated at UNC Charlotte?
Cases are initiated when faculty members or other University community members report suspected academic misconduct to the Director of Student Accountability & Conflict Resolution. The Director determines whether the case should proceed through informal resolution, facilitated resolution, or formal hearing.
What sanctions can UNC Charlotte impose for academic misconduct?
Academic Integrity Board can impose a range of sanctions depending on the violation, including reduced grade, reduced grade, disciplinary warning, and more serious outcomes including suspension and expulsion. The specific sanction depends on the facts, the student's prior record, and any mitigating factors presented during the proceeding. Sanction-phase advocacy is often as important as the responsibility phase, since even a first finding can carry long-term consequences on transcripts and graduate school applications.
How do I appeal a decision at UNC Charlotte, and what is the deadline?
The appeal deadline at UNC Charlotte is UNVERIFIED: needs human research. Students may appeal outcomes of Academic Misconduct cases. Appeals are processed according to procedures outlined in University Policy 407. The appeal process permits reconsideration of the case based on specified grounds. Appeal grounds typically include unverified: needs human research. Appeals that succeed are usually the ones that ground each argument in the record and the specific policy language, not emotional or general objections.
Do I need a lawyer for a UNC Charlotte Academic Integrity Board proceeding?
In most cases, no. UNC Charlotte's proceedings follow university policy under Code of Student Academic Integrity, not the legal system. What you need is someone who understands UNC Charlotte's specific procedures, the evidence standard, and how sanctions are assessed. An education advocate typically provides stronger, more targeted guidance than a general-practice attorney because the body of law here is university policy, not criminal or civil procedure. AdvocatED brings deep, specialized expertise in these exact processes at a fraction of a law firm's cost.
How does UNC Charlotte handle Title IX cases?
UNC Charlotte handles Title IX matters separately from general academic misconduct, through the Office of Civil Rights and Title IX. Operates under the Division of Institutional Integrity; led by Dr. Michelle Reinken, Assistant Vice Chancellor for Civil Rights and Title IX / Title IX Coordinator. Handles complaints of sexual misconduct, relationship violence, stalking, and related retaliation under University Policies 501, 502, and 504. Separate from academic integrity process. Contact: titleixcoordinator@uncc.edu or 704-687-6130. Title IX proceedings have their own procedures, evidence standards, and timelines. If you are a respondent in a Title IX case at UNC Charlotte, you should not conflate the process with general conduct cases, and you should respond carefully to any notice you receive.
What are the most common academic misconduct violations at UNC Charlotte?
At UNC Charlotte, the most frequently cited violations include: plagiarism (presenting the words or ideas of another as one's own without proper source acknowledgment); cheating (using or attempting to use unauthorized materials or assistance in academic exercises); unauthorized submission of same work in multiple courses; unauthorized alteration of data or information. Knowing which violation is alleged is the foundation of an effective defense, because the response strategy differs substantially based on whether the case involves plagiarism, AI use, exam cheating, collaboration, or a procedural technicality.
What are the key deadlines in a UNC Charlotte conduct case?
At UNC Charlotte, the most consequential deadlines are: UNVERIFIED: needs human research. Missing any of these windows can eliminate procedural options that are otherwise available. If you have received a notice from Academic Integrity Board, document the dates on the notice immediately and calendar every deadline, even ones that do not seem urgent.
References and primary sources
The procedural details on this page come directly from UNC Charlotte's own published policies and official university resources.
- https://legal.charlotte.edu/policies/up-407/Code of Student Academic Integrity (University Policy 407), Academic Integrity Board composition and authority, definitions of academic misconduct, standards of proof
- https://accountability.charlotte.edu/academic-integrity/code-overviewAcademic Integrity Code overview, evidence standard (preponderance of evidence), appeal procedures reference
- https://accountability.charlotte.edu/academic-integrityAcademic Integrity process overview, student and faculty responsibilities
- https://accountability.charlotte.edu/academic-integrity/academic-misconduct-policies-examples-0/Prohibited academic behaviors and common violations including cheating, plagiarism, and unauthorized material sharing
- https://legal.charlotte.edu/policies/up-406/Code of Student Responsibility, general conduct procedures, disciplinary outcomes/sanctions
- https://civilrights.charlotte.edu/Office of Civil Rights and Title IX contact information and jurisdiction
- https://diversity.charlotte.edu/dei-campus-inventory/title-ix-officeTitle IX Office leadership (Michelle Reinken), contact information
- https://legal.charlotte.edu/legal-topics/civil-rights-and-title-ixTitle IX policies and procedures overview
- https://legal.charlotte.edu/revisions/2017-08-15/revision-university-policy-407-code-student-academic-integrityPolicy revision history and timelines for adjudication
- https://legal.charlotte.edu/policies/revisionsRecent revisions to University Policy 407 including AI language, outcome-only hearing option, graduate student chapter
Facing a UNC Charlotte Conduct Issue?
Get your free case review today. We respond quickly and prioritize urgent cases, because we know UNC Charlotte's deadlines don't wait.