Facing this situation right now? Get expert guidance today.
Key Takeaway
If your child has been accused of an honor code violation at Georgia Tech, the case goes through the Office of Student Integrity (OSI).
If your child has been accused of violating Georgia Tech's honor code, the case will go through the Office of Student Integrity (OSI), which manages all honor code investigations and proceedings separately from standard student conduct. Georgia Tech's honor code is one of the strictest and most comprehensive in the country, it covers not just cheating and plagiarism but also broader definitions of integrity violations. The case can result in sanctions up to expulsion, operates on specific timelines, and the engineering and STEM focus of the institution means cases involving code plagiarism, AI tool misuse, and technical collaboration receive intense scrutiny.
In short:Georgia Tech operates under an honor code that applies to all students.
Georgia Tech operates under an honor code that applies to all students. The code is not just about academic work but about integrity in general interactions. When a faculty member suspects an honor code violation, they report it to the Office of Student Integrity. Unlike general student conduct systems, the honor code process emphasizes student responsibility and community standards.
What makes Georgia Tech's system distinctive is the scope of the honor code. It covers academic misconduct (cheating, plagiarism, unauthorized collaboration) but also covers dishonesty in other contexts (lying to faculty, falsifying documents, misrepresenting information). This broader definition means cases that might be handled differently at other universities fall under the honor code at Georgia Tech.
Additionally, Georgia Tech's engineering and STEM focus means the institution has increasingly specific rules about code plagiarism, use of AI tools in technical work, and collaborative programming practices. Understanding these STEM-specific issues is critical if your child is an engineering or computer science student.
In short:When an allegation is received, the Office of Student Integrity sends your child a detailed notice that includes the specific allegation, evidence collected during the initial investigation, your child's rights, and a response deadline.
When an allegation is received, the Office of Student Integrity sends your child a detailed notice that includes the specific allegation, evidence collected during the initial investigation, your child's rights, and a response deadline. The deadline is typically 5-10 business days. This is a hard deadline, missing it can result in default findings.
During the OSI investigation, staff interview the faculty member reporting the violation, interview the student, and may interview witnesses. For plagiarism allegations, OSI conducts detailed textual analysis to determine whether the student actually copied without attribution. For code plagiarism, OSI may conduct code comparison analysis or consult with technical experts to determine whether unauthorized code copying occurred.
Immediately gather all evidence of legitimate academic work: drafts showing work progression, research notes, coding commits (for programming work) showing iterative development, emails discussing the assignment, tutoring or writing center records, documentation of authorized resources used, and citations or code attribution.
For code-related allegations specifically, preserve all versions of code, commit history (which shows when code was written), and documentation of collaboration if collaboration was authorized.
In short:Georgia Tech has detailed policies on collaboration that vary by course and instructor.
Georgia Tech has detailed policies on collaboration that vary by course and instructor. Some courses explicitly allow pair programming or group work; others require strictly individual work. The distinction between authorized and unauthorized collaboration is critical.
If an allegation involves collaboration, the first question is: what did the syllabus and assignment guidelines say? If the instructor explicitly authorized collaboration, even detailed collaboration, it is not unauthorized. If the instructor said "individual work only," any collaboration becomes problematic regardless of how minor it was.
Georgia Tech also has specific guidance on using code from external sources. Using code from online resources (Stack Overflow, GitHub, etc.) is permitted when properly attributed. The policy specifies that you must cite the source, understand the code, and integrate it appropriately. Copying code without citation or without understanding it is plagiarism.
In short:Georgia Tech has been proactive in developing policies around AI tool usage in coursework.
Georgia Tech has been proactive in developing policies around AI tool usage in coursework. As of recent updates, Georgia Tech's policies vary by course and instructor on whether AI tools (ChatGPT, code generation tools, etc.) are permitted. Some courses explicitly allow AI use; others prohibit it; some require disclosure of AI use.
This is critical: if an allegation involves AI-generated or AI-assisted work, the first question is whether the instructor explicitly prohibited such tools or required disclosure. If the syllabus was silent on AI use, the allegation is much weaker. If the syllabus explicitly prohibited AI but permitted certain uses, your child's use must be evaluated against that specific policy.
In short:Georgia Tech offers informal resolution in some cases.
Georgia Tech offers informal resolution in some cases. An informal resolution conference involves your child meeting with an OSI staff member, discussing the allegation, and if the student accepts responsibility, agreeing on appropriate sanctions. This is faster (2-3 weeks) but offers limited appeal rights.
A formal hearing before the Georgia Tech Honor Board involves a panel (typically including student representatives). The board reviews evidence presented by both OSI and the student, questions witnesses if called, and makes findings on responsibility and sanctions.
Request a formal hearing if the evidence is contested, if the stakes are high, or if your child wants to directly challenge the allegations. The honor board, which includes students, often has nuanced understanding of what constitutes authentic work in academic contexts.
In short:An Honor Board hearing is structured and formal.
An Honor Board hearing is structured and formal. A panel of students, staff, and sometimes faculty reviews the case. OSI presents the case, your child presents their account and evidence, witnesses can be called by either side, and the panel asks questions.
Your child must be present. You cannot testify, but your child can bring a support person or advisor (not a lawyer). Some students bring advisors to help them stay organized. The hearing creates an official record.
The panel deliberates and makes findings of responsibility. If responsibility is found, they determine sanctions. The panel provides written findings explaining the basis for their decision.
In short:Georgia Tech's honor code process follows these timelines:
Georgia Tech's honor code process follows these timelines:
The entire process from initial allegation to final resolution typically takes 6-10 weeks. Your child remains enrolled during this time unless suspended pending hearing.
In short:Honor code violation sanctions include:
Honor code violation sanctions include:
First-time violations typically result in failing grade on the assignment and probation. More serious violations (deliberate cheating, fabrication, repeat violations) can result in suspension or expulsion. Georgia Tech takes honor code violations very seriously because the honor code is central to institutional identity.
In short:For engineering and computer science students, understand that plagiarism detection in code is different from text plagiarism detection.
For engineering and computer science students, understand that plagiarism detection in code is different from text plagiarism detection. Strong evidence in your child's favor includes: commit history showing incremental code development, comments in code showing understanding, tutoring or office hour records, and documentation of any authorized external sources used.
Weak evidence against your child includes: similarity percentages from automated tools without manual code review, vague instructor assertions that code "looks copied," and failure to distinguish between unavoidable similarity (common algorithms) and actual copying.
If code plagiarism is alleged, ask the instructor to explain the specific similarities they detected, show the lines of code compared, and demonstrate that these similarities are not explained by common algorithmic approaches or authorized sources.
In short:Georgia Tech's honor code explicitly defines academic integrity as "engaging in academic work with honesty and integrity, treating others with respect, and taking responsibility for one's actions.
Georgia Tech's honor code explicitly defines academic integrity as "engaging in academic work with honesty and integrity, treating others with respect, and taking responsibility for one's actions." This broader language means Georgia Tech applies the honor code more expansively than some peer institutions.
However, this broader language also provides defense opportunities. If the allegation involves minor collaboration or minor citation issues that arguably fall short of serious dishonesty, you can argue that the violation doesn't meet the seriousness threshold implied by Georgia Tech's language.
In short:Appeals are available for new evidence or procedural error.
Appeals are available for new evidence or procedural error. Appeals must be filed within 10 business days of the decision and are reviewed by the Dean of Students or a designate. An appeal is not a re-hearing but a review of whether the original process was fair and whether new evidence changes the outcome.
Strong appeals involve procedural violations (unfair hearing process, the student wasn't allowed to present evidence) or genuinely new evidence that materially affects the conclusion.
In short:AdvocatED helps families navigate Georgia Tech's honor code process, including understanding STEM-specific issues like code plagiarism and AI tool policies, preparing a strong initial response to OSI within the 5-10 day deadline, gathering ...
AdvocatED helps families navigate Georgia Tech's honor code process, including understanding STEM-specific issues like code plagiarism and AI tool policies, preparing a strong initial response to OSI within the 5-10 day deadline, gathering and organizing evidence including technical documentation, preparing your child to present clearly at an Honor Board hearing, and developing appeal strategy.
We understand how Georgia Tech's honor code works, what evidence matters in STEM contexts, and what realistic outcomes look like. We're not lawyers, so we can't serve as formal legal counsel, but we ensure you understand the process and what your child's realistic options are.
Georgia Tech's honor code is central to the institution's identity, which means the process is taken very seriously. Let us help you understand your child's situation clearly and respond effectively.
AdvocatED helps families navigate Georgia Tech's honor code process, including understanding STEM-specific issues like code plagiarism and AI tool policies, preparing a strong initial response to OSI within the 5-10 day deadline, gathering and organizing evidence including technical documentation, preparing your child to present clearly at an Honor Board hea...
AdvocatED provides free case reviews. Tell us what you're facing and we'll give you an honest assessment.