Louisiana · Public University
University of Louisiana at Monroe Student Conduct & Academic Misconduct Defense
Facing a Student Conduct Hearing Board proceeding? AdvocatED advisors know ULM's specific process under Code of Student Conduct (UNVERIFIED: needs human research).
If you just received notice
What to do right now at ULM
- 1Note the exact date on your notice letter and mark every deadline it contains on your calendar, at ULM, the appeal window is UNVERIFIED: needs human research, and missing a deadline forecloses your options.
- 2Do not respond substantively yet. Before you reply to the Student Conduct Hearing Board, review Code of Student Conduct (UNVERIFIED: needs human research) so you know the specific procedure that will be applied to your case.
- 3Identify an advisor who knows ULM's specific process. The evidence standard (preponderance of evidence) and appeal grounds are narrow, generic advice is not enough.
- 4Request the full case file. You have the right to be presented the evidence and witness information in advance and to inspect physical evidence, reviewing everything the school has before you respond is critical to building an accurate defense.
- 5Contact AdvocatED for a free case review before your ULM meeting. We'll explain exactly how Student Conduct Hearing Board will approach your case and what response gives you the strongest position.
Governing Policy
Code of Student Conduct · UNVERIFIED: needs human research
UNVERIFIED: needs human research
Evidence Standard
preponderance of evidence
Jurisdiction
Hear disciplinary cases and determine whether a student and/or student organization has violated the Student Code of Conduct
Who Decides Your Case
Student Conduct Hearing Board (SCHB)
Committee of students, faculty, and staff members
How a ULM Case Moves
1. How Cases Begin
A charged student is informed of the specific charges and receives an oral or written summons from an approved University Administrator. The matter is reviewed by the appropriate administrator or University unit for a possible disciplinary hearing before a designated panel such as the Conduct Standards Committee.
2. The Hearing
The charged party receives 24 to 72 hours notice to prepare a defense and may inspect physical evidence and review witness lists in advance. The hearing is conducted before a designated panel such as the Conduct Standards Committee or Student Organization Judicial Committee. The person bringing the charges presents evidence, the charged party presents a defense, and cross-examination of witnesses occurs when possible. The charged party is presumed not responsible until proven otherwise. Deliberations on responsibility and sanctions are closed, and the panel renders a decision based on the preponderance of evidence standard.
3. Appeals
Both complainant and respondent have opportunity to appeal decisions resulting from hearings in cases involving alleged sexual misconduct and power-based violence. Details found in Sexual Misconduct and Power-Based Violence Grievance Procedures.
Deadline: UNVERIFIED: needs human research
Grounds for appeal:
- New evidence that was not reasonably available at the time the determination was made that could affect the outcome
- Conflict of interest or bias of Title IX Coordinator, Investigator(s), or Decision-maker(s)
Your Rights at a ULM Hearing
- ✓Right to be informed of the specific charges and to have adequate time to prepare a defense
- ✓Right to be presumed not responsible until proven otherwise
- ✓Right to be presented the evidence and witness information in advance and to inspect physical evidence
- ✓Right to appear with one adviser (in a non-speaking role) and to present evidence and arguments in one's own defense
- ✓Right to cross-examine witnesses when possible
- ✓Right to request separate hearings when multiple students are charged
- ✓Right to appeal a decision
Sanctions ULM Can Impose
Drawn directly from Code of Student Conduct (UNVERIFIED: needs human research).
- 1.Removal from ULM Housing (Administrative Withdrawal)
- 2.Temporary Suspension
- 3.Suspension from the University
- 4.Dismissal from the University
- 5.Expulsion from the University
What Makes ULM's Process Distinctive
Common Violations Referred at ULM
Academic misconduct
Cheating and plagiarism
Hazing
Title IX at ULM
Title IX Office
Located in Walker Hall #1-32. Phone: (318) 342-1004. Email: titleix@ulm.edu. Handles reports of sex discrimination, sexual misconduct, sexual harassment, sexual assault, sexual exploitation, dating violence, domestic violence, stalking (on basis of sex), and power-based violence.
University of Louisiana at Monroe is located in Monroe, Louisiana. The institution maintains a Memorandum of Understanding with local law enforcement including the Ouachita Parish District Attorney's Office, Monroe Police Department, West Monroe Police Department, Sterlington Police Department, Richwood Police Department, and Ouachita Parish Sheriff's Office.
How AdvocatED Helps ULM Students
Academic Misconduct Defense
Hearing preparation for Code of Student Conduct cases, including plagiarism, cheating, and unauthorized AI use.
Learn more →Conduct Hearing Preparation
Strategic coaching and preparation for presenting your case before Student Conduct Hearing Board.
Learn more →Dismissal & Suspension Appeals
Building a compelling appeal through ULM's appellate process on the grounds that fit your case.
Learn more →Title IX Defense
Navigating Title IX Office investigations and hearings.
Learn more →ULM Resources & Guides
Related guides for ULM students
Topic-specific guides that cover the situations ULM students most commonly face.
Frequently Asked Questions: ULM Students
Who handles academic misconduct cases at ULM?
Student Conduct Hearing Board (SCHB) has jurisdiction over academic misconduct matters at ULM. Committee of students, faculty, and staff members Hear disciplinary cases and determine whether a student and/or student organization has violated the Student Code of Conduct
What is the evidence standard at ULM?
ULM applies preponderance of evidence under Code of Student Conduct (UNVERIFIED: needs human research). Student Conduct Hearing Board uses this standard when determining whether a student is responsible for an alleged violation. The evidence standard is critical because it determines how strong the evidence must be before a finding of responsibility can be made.
What rights do I have during a ULM conduct proceeding?
Under Code of Student Conduct, students facing a Student Conduct Hearing Board proceeding have specific procedural rights, including the right to be informed of the specific charges and to have adequate time to prepare a defense; be presumed not responsible until proven otherwise; be presented the evidence and witness information in advance and to inspect physical evidence; appear with one adviser (in a non-speaking role) and to present evidence and arguments in one's own defense. Exercising these rights correctly from the first notice can materially affect the outcome of your case.
How is an academic misconduct case initiated at ULM?
A charged student is informed of the specific charges and receives an oral or written summons from an approved University Administrator. The matter is reviewed by the appropriate administrator or University unit for a possible disciplinary hearing before a designated panel such as the Conduct Standards Committee.
What sanctions can ULM impose for academic misconduct?
Student Conduct Hearing Board can impose a range of sanctions depending on the violation, including removal from ulm housing, temporary suspension, suspension from the university, and more serious outcomes including suspension and expulsion. The specific sanction depends on the facts, the student's prior record, and any mitigating factors presented during the proceeding. Sanction-phase advocacy is often as important as the responsibility phase, since even a first finding can carry long-term consequences on transcripts and graduate school applications.
How do I appeal a decision at ULM, and what is the deadline?
The appeal deadline at ULM is UNVERIFIED: needs human research. Both complainant and respondent have opportunity to appeal decisions resulting from hearings in cases involving alleged sexual misconduct and power-based violence. Details found in Sexual Misconduct and Power-Based Violence Grievance Procedures. Appeal grounds typically include new evidence that was not reasonably available at the time the determination was made that could affect the outcome, conflict of interest or bias of title ix coordinator, investigator(s), or decision-maker(s). Appeals that succeed are usually the ones that ground each argument in the record and the specific policy language, not emotional or general objections.
Do I need a lawyer for a ULM Student Conduct Hearing Board proceeding?
In most cases, no. ULM's proceedings follow university policy under Code of Student Conduct, not the legal system. What you need is someone who understands ULM's specific procedures, the evidence standard, and how sanctions are assessed. An education advocate typically provides stronger, more targeted guidance than a general-practice attorney because the body of law here is university policy, not criminal or civil procedure. AdvocatED brings deep, specialized expertise in these exact processes at a fraction of a law firm's cost.
How does ULM handle Title IX cases?
ULM handles Title IX matters separately from general academic misconduct, through the Title IX Office. Located in Walker Hall #1-32. Phone: (318) 342-1004. Email: titleix@ulm.edu. Handles reports of sex discrimination, sexual misconduct, sexual harassment, sexual assault, sexual exploitation, dating violence, domestic violence, stalking (on basis of sex), and power-based violence. Title IX proceedings have their own procedures, evidence standards, and timelines. If you are a respondent in a Title IX case at ULM, you should not conflate the process with general conduct cases, and you should respond carefully to any notice you receive.
What are the most common academic misconduct violations at ULM?
At ULM, the most frequently cited violations include: academic misconduct; cheating and plagiarism; hazing. Knowing which violation is alleged is the foundation of an effective defense, because the response strategy differs substantially based on whether the case involves plagiarism, AI use, exam cheating, collaboration, or a procedural technicality.
References and primary sources
The procedural details on this page come directly from ULM's own published policies and official university resources.
- https://www.ulm.edu/osaa/Office of Student Advocacy and Accountability contact information
- https://ulm.edu/osaa/hearingboard.htmlStudent Conduct Hearing Board composition and jurisdiction
- https://www.ulm.edu/titleix/Title IX office location, contact information, and jurisdiction
- https://www.ulm.edu/titleix/appeal.htmlAppeal process for Title IX cases and grounds for appeal
- https://www.ulm.edu/osaa/policies.htmlList of policies including Code of Student Conduct, Sexual Misconduct and Power-Based Violence Policy, Hazing Policy
- https://catalog.ulm.edu/content.php?catoid=21&navoid=2637ULM Code of Student Conduct catalog reference
- https://catalog.ulm.edu/content.php?catoid=27&navoid=3230Section Four Procedural Due Process Principles: preponderance of evidence standard, case initiation, hearing process, student procedural rights, sanctions list
- https://catalog.ulm.edu/content.php?catoid=27&navoid=3840Office of Student Services student conduct process: Dean of Students use of preponderance of evidence standard
Facing a ULM Conduct Issue?
Get your free case review today. We respond quickly and prioritize urgent cases, because we know ULM's deadlines don't wait.